And every pro-”choice” person would be willing to kill baby Jesus in Mary’s womb.
He must have just watched Boys from Brazil.
It’s a stupid hypothetcal that shouldn’t be entertained as a valid question, because its impossible to know what a baby will do as an adult.
We get time travel working, then this becomes a plausible question to discuss.
Y not have people from the Right-to-Life movement speak?
Well Deadpool suggested going back in time to kill baby Hitler, in the extended version of Deadpool 2. But then when he actually zapped himself back in time, and found baby Hitler in the hospital nursery, he discovered the reason the baby was so miserable, was because he needed his diaper changed.
Just as soon as they get that Time Machine working with 100% reliability.
Actually, he is correct. A Pro-Lifer who accepts the true principle of what it means must accept the fact that a child in itself is innocent of his or her future actions.
I know some folks who have caused nothing except harm and as much as I despise them, wouldn’t have killed them as a Pro-Lifer.
It’s a bitter pill, to carry from my own life the true knowledge of abortion. It has taught me that no matter the acts later in life, the unborn child is truly innocent.
Ben Shapiro is f-n nuts.....he is his own circular firing squad. He can’t get over being bounced by Steve Brannon while both were at Breitbart. He would do well to join up with Bill Kristol and that other smuglet.....the puny guy with the rug and round glasses?.....I love it when so much time becomes the back end of revenge that condemns these people to the cold, dark corner of irrelevance.......my deepest hope is that Romney will be soon to follow.
Why did he go THERE?
If testing could show that a baby would be gay, would pro-death abortion fans be OK with that being the reason for terminating a pregnancy?
“Gay” babies couldn’t be protected from genetic discrimination?
Make the left play by their own freaking rules. - Saul Alinsky
I don’t know about that...
Why stop at Hitler? If the other side wants to know if we would kill a baby Hitler, then why shouldn’t we be judge and jury of all we deem to be evil, including Democrats? /sarc (Sarcasm tag just in case anyone thinks I’m serious).
This whole line of inquiry is about the dumbest thing I’ve seen all week (well except everything to come from the Democrats on the hill, LOL)
If I could go back in time a la Back to the Future I certainly would kill baby Hitler. And baby Stalin. And certainly the entire Kim Il Sung family. But of course this defies a number of physical laws so it’s just stupid to argue over it. If you really like the debate go watch Minority Report and see how this works.
Of course not. You kill Hilter’s mom before she gets pregnant. /s
Ben gave an excellent speech today at the March for Life. The Hill web site is deceptive and not accurate. Ben’s speech is worth reviewing.
The question is stupid. No one can foresee the future.
How about this: “Would you have killed the baby adolf hitler if you had known that he would grow up to be a brutal depraved murderer?”
But the question remains theoretical because that’s an impossible situation. If you kill the baby he doesn’t become a brutal depraved murderer, and you killed a baby.
So, ah, I guess this dope knows who today’s “baby Hitler” is...
I would.