One of Progressivism's first big successes was to move state "safety" requirements outside of Constitutional protections.
Dumb questions get dumb answers.
No, they were lost is a terrible boating accident.
When gun owners can give doctors advice on Medicine it should be fair enough.
They never give up, these fascists! refuse to cooperate with them.
Gun safety should be taught in schools. The NRA will send Eddie Eagle to schools to give them an idea how to teach gun safety.
Easy peasie.
The correct answer is no.
Always.
Dr Q: “Do you own guns?”
Patent A: “Do you still beat your mistress?”
I stay the hell out of Boston but, if my Dr. asks, I’ll have to relate the sad story of how all my firearms were lost in a tragic canoeing accident. Never could afford to replace them.
I had a doctor ask me this once. I told him it was none of his business.
Choose your doctor wisely. MY doctor is a hunter, enjoys trapshooting, and of course is a gunowner. He is also very proTrump. My former doctor was also all of the above except he enjoyed skeet. Years of hunting experiences exchanged have made visits for health reasons mostly enjoyable.
The Boston "Mayor" could save many more lives by registering and locking up Kennedys than doctors asking about guns.
Fine. They can all say NO.
Do we get to ask the doctor if he/she has stopped beating their spouse yet?
Lie to them.
Everybody lies to you.
All of my guns were lost in a tragic boating accident.
Correct answer to “do you own guns”?
“No,” or perhaps: “No, those are dangerous.” Don’t get irate. Don’t get cute. Just a simple negative answer, perhaps with a bit of fear because guns sometimes jump out and kill people (especially the scary black assault ones with a threaded barrel or a bayonet lug). If the question is mandatory, stop there. If you’re in a state where your doctor is asking because your doctor supports tyranny, still stop there but also find a new doctor.
From the 14th Amendment:
"Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
Note that the 14th Amendment was recently used to reprimand UC Berkeley for abridging free speech for example.
UC Berkeley settles landmark free speech lawsuit, will pay $70,000 to conservative group
H O W E V E R …
Patriots also need to elect a patriot Congress in 2020 elections that will not only support PDJT’s vision for MAGA, but will promise to exercise its 14th Amendment power to make penal laws that discourage state actors from abridging constitutionally enumerated protections.
Insights welcome.