Posted on 01/14/2019 4:41:18 PM PST by ptsal
The District of Columbia recently passed legislation that may affect the ability of servicers and lenders to adequately assess title on certain properties in Washington, D.C. The new statute—dubbed the Address Confidentiality Act of 2018, which became effective on October 1, 2018—is designed to protect the victims of domestic violence.
According to the terms of the Act, if an individual applies for the program and is certified as a victim of stalking, domestic violence, human trafficking, or a range of other sexual offenses, the individual will be issued an identification card with a substitute address. The substitute address will be a mailbox to which mail can be sent, and from which the office that administers the program will forward mail to the program participant’s actual address. More importantly from a title perspective, a participant in the program can submit a request to any D.C. government office or agency to remove all publicly accessible references to their actual address. This means that a participant may have their name removed from all publicly available land records, tax records, or court records. This presents obvious problems for the title industry, as well as to loan originators and servicers.
Also problematic at this point is the fact that D.C. has not provided crucial details of such activity. Namely, there is no word yet whether the redacted information will simply be absent or if there will be an indication that the information is being withheld pursuant to this program. Thus, a title search may come back with documents simply missing—e.g., a deed or deed of trust simply not appearing in a title search, or a lack of a tax record appearing when performing an escrow analysis. Alternatively, the record might come back with some indication that the information was being omitted, with or without explanation.
The District of Columbia has not yet provided any answers as to how such matters will be treated. Further complicating the issue is the fact that, as currently written, the statute does not allow the participant to selectively direct the release of their information. Their only choice appears to remove themselves entirely from the program—hardly the route that someone fearing for their safety would choose. Overall, the potential implications of this statute for title are enormous, and until D.C. provides more information as to how such matters will be handled, the state of title in D.C. will remain uncertain.
general info
Not a good idea.
If people really need it make them go into the existing witness relocation programs that already exist.
I’m all for it, since I know someone with a problem it would help her with. She moves frequently and a stalker keeps finding her. The kind of stalker that a PFA doesn’t deter.
Well, I disagree.
The bad actors in DC will abuse this program.
Good luck w/DC debt collection. Why pay for a car? Repo man can’t find you.
I’ll bet the terminators of Seth Rich can find anyone.
Thanks ptsal.
...designed to protect the victims of domestic violence.
Attacking journalists and Republicans in their homes and in public places? Still okay.
A friend who lives in DC was in a minor bicycle accident. She was unpleasantly surprised to discover that a policeman could ask for her driver’s license and scan the bar code on it for her medical records. Also that there is an iris scan included on the license. She says Libertarians in DC are quite upset about this. She doesn’t remember any news about this being passed by the city council. How many states are actually doing this without telling us?
All of this technology and Seth Rich’s killer is still a mystery.
Make sure you have all your relevant documents in a safe deposit box...
She needs a friend to stalk the stalker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.