Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robowombat
I am curious, how in circa 1860 did the Fedgov refuse to honor the Constitution as written? Real question,

Article 4, section 2. They absolutely refused to enforce it.

It may be an immoral clause, but the legal system is supposed to enforce the law as written, even when they don't like it.

124 posted on 01/11/2019 2:23:37 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Now I will have to look that up.


125 posted on 01/11/2019 2:24:56 PM PST by robowombat (Orthodox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp; robowombat; DoodleDawg; rockrr
robowambat: "I am curious, how in circa 1860 did the Fedgov refuse to honor the Constitution as written? Real question,"

DiogenesLamp: "Article 4, section 2.
They absolutely refused to enforce it.
It may be an immoral clause, but the legal system is supposed to enforce the law as written, even when they don't like it."

More lies from DiogenesLamp.
In fact the 1850 Compromise moved enforcement of Fugitive Slave Laws from the states to the Federal Government and empowered Feds to force states compliance.
And from 1801 onwards, Federal government was under the nearly continuous control of Southern Democrats.
From 1853 to 1861 Democrats ruled the Presidency, Senate & Supreme Court so could dictate whatever terms they wanted.
In four of those eight years they also controlled the House and so had no excuse if Federal government didn't give them what they wanted.

237 posted on 01/13/2019 9:18:26 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson