Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PELOSI: Illegals Killing Americans ‘Not a Justification’ for Stricter Border Security Rules
BigLeaguePolitics.com ^ | 1/10/19 | Peter D'Abrosca

Posted on 01/10/2019 12:11:05 PM PST by blueyon

At a Thursday morning press conference, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) showed little concern for the fact that illegal aliens crossing the border with impunity might be dangerous for Americans. “Let me just close by saying this: clearly there’s a disparity of shared values in terms of respecting the dignity and worth of everyone – being concerned about every death that happens, uh, because we live in an imperfect world, and that’s very sad,” Pelosi said. “But it is not a justification for having more children die in custody of be separated from their families.”

(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda; buildthewall; corruption; democrats; mediabias; ownit; pelosi; potus; shutdown; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: blueyon

FU you smarmy, aggressive, unethical, untalented, but willing to do almost ANYTHING to ‘win’, narcissistic witch. Don’t talk to me about the dignity and worth of everyone, when you look down your nose at all Americans who don’t think like you and, more importantly, who won’t vote for you or your party. You are entirely disingenuous. It’s all about you. Disgusting.


41 posted on 01/10/2019 12:32:41 PM PST by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Watching the Nan and she said 90% of the drugs come through ports of entry?

How would you know that?? There is no way to tell how much comes across that you don’t find.


42 posted on 01/10/2019 12:33:07 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

her statements, and those of many other officials and politicians fit the legal definition of DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE:

To constitute depraved indifference, the defendant’s conduct must be ‘so wanton, so deficient in a moral sense of concern, so lacking in regard for the life or lives of others, and so blameworthy as to warrant the same criminal liability as that which the law imposes upon a person who intentionally causes a crime. Depraved indifference focuses on the risk created by the defendant’s conduct, not the injuries actually resulting.

It’s about time that the families of the victims of illegal aliens start a campaign to charge officials with DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE.


43 posted on 01/10/2019 12:34:11 PM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

She has no incentive to compromise; people in Marin County would vote for her in perpetuity if they could.


44 posted on 01/10/2019 12:35:41 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I guess we need to close all the prisons then. Or at least let all those incarcerated fathers and mothers go scot free.


45 posted on 01/10/2019 12:36:51 PM PST by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

So if an illegal kills a pelosi family member she will say, oh well?


46 posted on 01/10/2019 12:39:57 PM PST by Leep (Leftist are neither liberal or democratic. Neither are they pro American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

One thing I noticed during the presser was when Nanzi
was asked a question and didn’t hear all of it and said
to the reporter (female), I’m sorry DEAR, I didn’t hear
all of it”. Just imagine the howls of the press if
President Trump had done that!


47 posted on 01/10/2019 12:40:11 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

It’s a shame Nancy Pelosi hates American Citizens. But, she is the party who despises Americans


48 posted on 01/10/2019 12:41:07 PM PST by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
I just don't get it. WTF do politicians who support illegal aliens over Americans, hope to gain?

Money and power. I believe they are paid very well to keep borders open and support illegal immigration. Businesses that want the cheap labor express, special interest groups, special interest billionaires. I personally think the money is the big deal- campaign money ++++ in my opinion. I think the potential votes are a bonus reason.

49 posted on 01/10/2019 12:41:53 PM PST by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Leep

She’ll feel pious for her human sacrifice to the Diversity God. It’s the in thing with Leftists these days.


50 posted on 01/10/2019 12:42:05 PM PST by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

.
You can’t make this stuff up!

Let’s make every Democrat wear that outrageous statement on their forehead if they run for office!
.


51 posted on 01/10/2019 12:43:38 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Soros money


52 posted on 01/10/2019 12:44:31 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Yeah, if illegals suddenly started voting republican, Nan wouldn’t be able to get that wall built fast enough.


53 posted on 01/10/2019 12:48:16 PM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

By accepting blacks killing blacks wholsale in Baltomore and Chicaho, it is just a short step in the mind to accept illegals killing cops.


54 posted on 01/10/2019 12:50:05 PM PST by bert ( (KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Princess Gray Beaver, for President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Well, OK, then what exactly IS a justification for tighter border security? Hmmm, Nanzi? ANYTHING, ANYTHING AT ALL???

We know that the answer is “No,” and that is because the Dems believe (with good reason) that higher immigration only hastens the day when the entire country is electorally like CA or NJ. They aren’t giving up on that for ANY reason, and they don’t care how ridiculous they look or whom they throw under the bus (especially including Blacks, who are probably the worst single victimized group in this whole matter). Union folks also suffer a bunch. They don’t care - they just want more and permanent power.


55 posted on 01/10/2019 12:51:27 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbrfl

Yes a wall would actually be humanitarian for those entering illegally. Most of those that come here illegally across the desert have been lied to; the coyotes tell them it is so easy, and they will be welcomed with open arms in paradise. I have seen womens high heels, and other impractical things left on the border in the middle of nowhere. You have to know the women wearing them had no idea they would be hiking for days in the harsh desert. The illegals themselves claim they were lied to...told they would only have to walk like one mile across. They are abandoned in the desert and told they are like a mile from a major city- out here they tell them Phoenix- which is actually over 300 miles from here.

The illegals are lied to and exploited, raped, robbed, beaten. Many are actually trafficked for work and prostitution. Many are kidnapped at the end of their journey, held for ransom to be paid by their families. Some are forced to carry drugs. It is sick, anyone that supports open borders/illegal immigration is supporting the whole package which is truly ugly and heartbreaking. Pure evil is what the whole picture is. The elderly, unfit, pregnant women, those that get injured or sick are often abandoned in the desert to die when they can’t keep up with the group.


56 posted on 01/10/2019 12:54:39 PM PST by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
.
Pelousi is a California Aristocrat!

(We have lots of them here)

California is ruled by an aristocracy

Aristocracy

1. the highest class in certain societies, especially those holding hereditary titles or offices.

“the ancient Polish aristocracy had hereditary right to elect the king”

synonyms:

nobility, peerage, gentry, gentility, upper class, ruling class, elite, high society, establishment, haut monde;More

* a form of government in which power is held by the nobility.
* a state governed by the aristocracy.
plural noun: aristocracies

California Aristocrats:

Pat Brown, former Governor of California, deceased.

Jerry Brown, Governor of California, net worth $4,000,000

Dianne Feinstein, Senator, estimate net worth $94 million

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House estimated net worth of $100,643,521

Barbara Boxer former Senator has a net worth of $6 million

John Burton Democratic Chairman net worth (?)

Gordon Getty net worth is $2 billion

The State of California

3rd largest State in the Union

155,973S square miles

As of 2015 California had the highest population in the USA. Population: 39,144,818

CALIFORNIA
Saga of four intertwined Bay Area families
By Dan Walters
West County Times
1-6-2019

Gavin Newsom will be the first Democrat in more than a century to succeed another Democrat as governor and the succession also marks a big generational transition in California politics.
A long-dominant geriatric quintet from the San Francisco Bay Area — Gov. Jerry Brown, Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and state Democratic chairman John Burton — has been slowly ceding power to younger political strivers.

Moreover, Newsom is succeeding someone who could be considered his quasi-uncle since his inauguration continues the decades-long saga of four San Francisco families intertwined by blood, by marriage, by money, by culture and, of course, by politics — the Browns, the Newsoms, the Pelosis and the Gettys.

The connections date back at least 80 years, to when Jerry Brown’s father, Pat Brown, ran for San Francisco district attorney, losing in 1939 but winning in 1943, with the help of his close friend and Gavin Newsom’s grandfather, businessman William Newsom.

Fast forward two decades.
Gov. Pat Brown’s administration developed Squaw Valley for the 1960 Winter Olympics and afterward awarded a concession to operate it to William Newsom and his partner, John Pelosi.

One of the Pelosi’s sons, Paul, married Nancy D’Alesandro, who went into politics and has now reclaimed the speakership of the House of Representatives.
Another Pelosi son married William Newsom’s daughter, Barbara. Until they divorced, that made Nancy Pelosi something like an aunt by marriage to Gavin Newsom (Nancy Pelosi’s brother-in-law was Gavin Newsom’s uncle).
The Squaw Valley concession was controversial at the time and created something of a rupture between the two old friends.

William Newsom wanted to make significant improvements to the ski complex, including a convention center, but Brown’s Department of Parks and Recreation balked. Newsom and his son, an attorney also named William, held a series of contentious meetings with officials over the issue.

An eight-page memo about those 1966 meetings from the department’s director, Fred Jones, buried in the Pat Brown archives, describes the Newsoms as being embittered and the senior Newsom threatening to “hurt the governor politically” as Brown ran for a third term that year against Ronald Reagan.

Pat Brown’s bid for a third term failed, and the Reagan administration later bought out the Newsom concession. But the Brown-Newsom connection continued as Brown’s son, Jerry, claimed the governorship in 1974. He appointed the younger William Newsom, a personal friend and Gavin’s father, to a Placer County judgeship in 1975 and three years later to the state Court of Appeal.

Judge Newsom, who died a few weeks ago, had been an attorney for oil magnate J. Paul Getty, most famously delivering $3 million to Italian kidnapers of Getty’s grandson in 1973.
While serving on the appellate bench in the 1980s, he helped Getty’s son, Gordon, secure a change in state trust law that allowed him to claim his share of a multi-heir trust.

After Newsom retired from the bench in 1995, he became administrator of Gordon Getty’s own trust, telling one interviewer, “I make my living working for Gordon Getty.” The trust provided seed money for the Plumpjack chain of restaurants and wine shops that Newsom’s son, Gavin, and Gordon Getty’s son, Billy, developed, the first being in a Squaw Valley hotel.

Gavin Newsom had been informally adopted by the Gettys after his parents divorced.
Newsom’s Plumpjack business (named for an opera that Gordon Getty wrote) led to a career in San Francisco politics, a stint as mayor, the lieutenant governorship and now to the governorship, succeeding his father’s old friend.

He’s keeping it all in the extended family.

57 posted on 01/10/2019 12:56:05 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Just keep running your mouth, Nancy.

We’re watching and getting more pissed by the minute.


You don’t know me but I’m your brother
I was raised here in this living hell
You don’t know my kind in your world
Fairly soon the time will tell
You, telling me the things you’re gonna do for me
I ain’t blind and I don’t like what I think I see
Takin’ it to the streets
Takin’ it to the streets
Takin’ it to the streets
Takin’ it to the streets

Take this message to my brother
You will find him everywhere
Wherever people live together
Tied in poverty’s despair
You, telling me the things you’re gonna do for me
I ain’t blind and I don’t like what I think I see

Takin’ it to the streets
Takin’ it to the streets
Takin’ it to the streets
Takin’ it to the streets


58 posted on 01/10/2019 12:56:28 PM PST by nesnah (Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Pelosi “Full Retard”.


59 posted on 01/10/2019 12:58:01 PM PST by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
I just don't get it. WTF do politicians who support illegal aliens over Americans, hope to gain?

VOTES and never ending seats of power.

60 posted on 01/10/2019 1:00:30 PM PST by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson