[BlueLancer]

But it should be regulated in public.

I don't smoke, either tobacco or marijuana, but I cannot understand how smoking marijuana isn't restricted to the level that smoking tobacco is. Both are burning weeds; if there are tars and carcinogens in burning tobacco, wouldn't there be the same problems with burning marijuana?

[originalbuckeye]

Absolutely! And there is no filter on a marijuana cigarette.

[gundog]

It’s illegal to smoke pot in public, in Oregon. It’s almost illegal to smoke tobacco in public.

[John S Mosby]

See my post # 28. And elsewhere on this subject on FR.

Massive carcinogens of over 100 id’d compounds (seriously carcinogenic— which is ironic, considering manufacturers are forced by California stoner legislators to put “carcinogen labeling” on all kinds of products (so they can be sold in CA). Things like plastic baby car seats.

But there is zero labeling on a truly harmful “product”. Don’t care if people (older than 30 anyway) want to get stoned on stuff they grow— but they won’t be flying my plane or any other i’d get on.

this is massive democrat run, clinical and political fraud.

[Lizavetta]

Both are burning weeds; if there are tars and carcinogens in burning tobacco, wouldn't there be the same problems with burning marijuana?

I find it amazing (and typical double standard of the Left) that during their loud demands for legalization their previous concerns about the dangers of smoking and cancer and children inhaling second hand smoke evaporated.