Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Xi threatens Taiwan with force but also seeks peaceful 'reunification'
Reuters ^ | January 1, 2019 10:05 PM | Ben Blanchard, Yimou Lee

Posted on 01/02/2019 9:29:35 AM PST by Olog-hai

China reserves the right to use force to bring Taiwan under its control but will strive to achieve peaceful “reunification” with the self-ruled island that has a bright future under any future Chinese rule, President Xi Jinping said on Wednesday.

Taiwan is China’s most sensitive issue and is claimed by Beijing as its sacred territory. Xi has stepped up pressure on the democratic island since Tsai Ing-wen from the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party became president in 2016.

Tsai rejected Xi’s call and instead urged China to embrace democracy.

Xi has set great personal store in resolving what the Communist Party calls the “Taiwan issue”, holding a landmark meeting with then Taiwan president Ma Ying-jeou in Singapore in late 2015, just before Tsai was elected.

Xi spoke at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People on the 40th anniversary of a landmark Taiwan policy statement.

He said “reunification” must come under a one-China principle that accepts Taiwan as part of China, anathema to supporters of Taiwan independence, adding that the “one country, two systems” model of autonomy, with which China governs Hong Kong, was the best way for Taiwan. …

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; invasion; redchina; reddiaperdoperbabies; taiwan

1 posted on 01/02/2019 9:29:35 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I’d love to have us recognize Taiwan as a separate country. In all ways.


2 posted on 01/02/2019 9:36:00 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Taiwan needs MODERN subs.

And fighter aircraft.


3 posted on 01/02/2019 9:40:06 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

they would be copied by China in 2 weeks


4 posted on 01/02/2019 9:41:41 AM PST by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aces

If China copies nukes, who cares? Nukes hiding in a sub somewhere are great retaliatory weapons. China does not want a nuclear attack on them killing a billion people.


5 posted on 01/02/2019 9:47:07 AM PST by entropy12 (One million LEGAL immigrants/year is too many, without vetting for skills, Wealth or English skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It’s not like Taiwan hasn’t been preparing for the last 70 years.


6 posted on 01/02/2019 9:59:23 AM PST by Robert Wright (It's amazing how much more civil you will be when you post and reply under your real name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Hey! Like, don’t put our sailors and pilots in harm’s way for nothing, maaaaan. Bring them all home. We’re not the world police, doooooooood. China’s our friend, just like Russia, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea and all. We should be living here in libertarian euphoria, peace and harmony. No one is attacking us. Don’t worry ‘bout tomorrow. Live for today!

[See how weak we are? Come and get some, Xi and Putin. It’s now or never.]


7 posted on 01/02/2019 10:07:48 AM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: entropy12

“China does not want a nuclear attack on them killing a billion people.”

It’s unlikely an attack by Taiwan would kill that many, but even if it did, it would leave China with a population twice that of the US.


9 posted on 01/02/2019 10:19:55 AM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: familyop

How many troops does China have in Syria?

It’s not about the US willingness to oppose existential threats, it’s all about prioritization. We need more reserves in the US so that we are in a position to respond and deploy against emerging threats.

China is the biggest US existential threat at this time. The Southern border is a close second.


10 posted on 01/02/2019 10:56:47 AM PST by grumpygresh (Abolish administrative law. It's regressive, medieval and unconstitutional!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

China does not want a nuclear attack on them killing a billion people.


Used to be that if we killed 250.000,000 of them and they killed 250,000,000 of us they’d win ... or so Mao told Nixon. Doubt if that metric has changed - just the numbers are different.

Besides, China has some 350 nukes and has just launched its ‘boomer’ class of icbm toting subs.


11 posted on 01/02/2019 11:33:20 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

How many troops does China have in Syria?

A lot - mostly hunting Uigurs.


12 posted on 01/02/2019 11:34:19 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Good timing to get our forces out of (and moving out of) the Middle East. Let our ‘friends’ take care of their own business...they can handle it for now.

China may need a major slap-down. I hope that President Trump’s economic one will suffice, but I am not optimistic that it alone will be enough.

That country is a MAJOR budding threat to a whole lot of our interests in the Pacific.


13 posted on 01/02/2019 2:04:38 PM PST by Oscar in Batangas (12:01 PM 1/20/2017...The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

Imagine what our population would be today if we hadn’t killed off all the babies and women were still desiring children!


14 posted on 01/02/2019 2:06:41 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Like Tawain’s going to buckle under Communist China....that’s a not. The Tiwanese people are prepared to fend off any attack by China until we get there...and they know it will cost life for them to do that....


15 posted on 01/02/2019 2:09:46 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

lets pray so


16 posted on 01/03/2019 4:21:54 AM PST by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

It is not how many get killed/maimed/get cancer....
It is the incredible devastation of infra-structure and creation of horrible chaos, which is the real deterrent for nations starting nuclear wars.


17 posted on 01/03/2019 9:36:23 AM PST by entropy12 (One million LEGAL immigrants/year is too many, without vetting for skills, Wealth or English skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Iran seems enamored with the notion.


18 posted on 01/03/2019 9:55:00 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Iran is being run by religious extremist Ayatollahs so do not expect any rational moves. Until Iran changes into a legit democracy, all bets are off.


19 posted on 01/04/2019 6:04:02 AM PST by entropy12 (One million LEGAL immigrants/year is too many, without vetting for skills, Wealth or English skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson