Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Libs forcing landlords to rent to any Joe Blow. What could possibly go wrong?
1 posted on 12/27/2018 9:51:32 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: bgill

Can we assume sex offenders can now rent above the local day care center for young children?


2 posted on 12/27/2018 9:54:02 AM PST by GOPJ (DC Swamp critters can't sell influence or American blood in the Middle East anymore. They're frantic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Wouldn’t this be a First Amendment issue...telling you that you don’t have the freedom to associate with those of your choosing?


3 posted on 12/27/2018 9:55:33 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

I’m surprised that in Seattle there are still people who don’t understand that the Government controls all the property. Property rights is so 20th century.


4 posted on 12/27/2018 9:55:56 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

They just created an instant housing shortage. Landlords will just quit renting their properties rather than take this risk.


5 posted on 12/27/2018 9:55:59 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill
Libs forcing landlords to rent to any Joe Blow. What could possibly go wrong?

Just check their credit history.

6 posted on 12/27/2018 9:56:31 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

[[A new Seattle housing law forbids landlords from checking tenants’ criminal history]]

Yet when a tenant gets attacked by one of the criminals who live there- the owner will be sued into oblivion for not protecting the tenants-


8 posted on 12/27/2018 9:57:44 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

You own property? no, you only think you own property. The left resents private property and will do all it can to eliminate it. This is one more step on the way to complete takeover of private property.


9 posted on 12/27/2018 9:58:39 AM PST by I want the USA back (There are two sexes: male (pronoun HE), and female (pronoun SHE). Denial of this is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Whooppee! This will really increase the amount of rentals for the homeless and destitute. Those money grubbing landlords will no doubt be happy to rent to anyone. Problem solved.

What do these leftist use for brains? I have a rental house overseen by a property manager. He checks criminal records and credit scores for any prospective renter. In six years I have not had a problem with any renter misusing or abusing the house. There are always normal maintenance costs, etc., but I don’t want to deal with Section 8 types and felons.

If I were subject to this type of law, I would sell the place in a Seattle second.


10 posted on 12/27/2018 9:59:25 AM PST by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Just go online to the State’s criminal offender registry to see their record.

Then deny them because someone else was in line ahead of them.


11 posted on 12/27/2018 10:00:59 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

This is probably due to the fact that credit reports now often include any criminal record

Just a guess

Man I can recall when you didn’t need credit report to rent an apt

Now you may need it just to rent a car or hotel room if you only have a debit card

I detest how credit reports are compiled

I personally have paid six figures thru business my commercial mortgages always on time and never got credit for that

Yet the 35-50 routine credit enquirers annually cost 40-60 points for a time which means I’ll never have super high credit self employed with numerous commercial mortgages which are credit checked annually despite my stellar payoff record since the 80s

And when wifey mistakenly paid home mortgage from an overdraft account which is auto rejected by Chase, they didn’t notify us till the next mortgage statement at which time you’re officially late

My credit which affects substantial business debt was hit from 740-630....630 fair/good.....not good for me

Six months later I’m 690-700

But you get warnings constantly about credit balance and whatnot

There has to be a better way

One way is making the agencies more responsive


12 posted on 12/27/2018 10:01:44 AM PST by wardaddy (I don’t care that you’re not a racist......when the shooting starts it won’t matter what yo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

I was a landlord just one time. We had invested in second mortgages with a pool of other investors. We took a property back in foreclosure and, instead of selling it, we rented it out. The person we put in charge of finding a tenant didn’t do a background check! He got a criminal tenant who made two payments, then quit paying (a cop friend ran his hotsheet for us and he had a record a mile long, fortunately all non-violent).

Being Santa Cruz County, it took SIX MONTHS to evict him. During that time, water and power were cut off, but he continued to use the toilets that couldn’t be flushed. He stole all the fixtures, hot tub pump, appliances, and left garbage knee deep throughout as well as lots of holes in the walls.

I would NEVER be a landlord unless I could run criminal background checks.

This action will greatly reduce the number of apartments for rent in Seattle. What landlord wants to go through what we went through?


14 posted on 12/27/2018 10:02:54 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

I own rentals in the area. I’ve told my realtor not to suggest anything close to Seattle city limits. This new law is a disaster for multi family property owners.


16 posted on 12/27/2018 10:07:46 AM PST by Lucky2 (Trump/Pence 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Credit, perhaps. SO much unfairness in credit checks. Criminal? No way. Must be checked.


19 posted on 12/27/2018 10:15:25 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

Yet another reason I would never ever own rental property - the horror stories are already sickening. I don’t see how it’s worth it.

Just buy REITs, collect the dividends, and go play golf in peace.


20 posted on 12/27/2018 10:17:51 AM PST by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

A clear violation of the 1st amendment freedom of assembly clause.


21 posted on 12/27/2018 10:19:11 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

One day they will prohibit banks from checking on your ability to repay the loan. The bank will just have to assume you have the assets you either claim or not and lend you the money either way.


24 posted on 12/27/2018 10:27:16 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

There’s also an equal protection argument in that the law is prohibiting a discrete class of citizens from accessing what’s otherwise public information.


28 posted on 12/27/2018 10:35:19 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

I own seven rentals. This year I had two different renter’s wives end up in prison from using drugs and all the crimes that go with that. It devastated me. I lost more than a year’s rent on each house, due t damage and eviction costs. I still have to make all the tax, insurance and mortgage payments. From now on, I will do a background check.

Both families were formerly “middle” class Caucasians. Incidentally, no problems with the black couples or the mixed race couple.


29 posted on 12/27/2018 10:36:40 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill
If the person has no active warrants, is not violating the law by trying to rent (e.g., no restrictions on living within x feet of something), it is not the property owner's business what their history is. The only issue is whether they have financial ability to pay, maybe some references. If a person is currently able to pay, regardless of felon, gun ownership, past bankruptcy, party membership, etc. they should be able to rent. It is a financial transaction, nothing more. Otherwise, like recently in Boston, a place kicks out someone because she owns a gun. I had a bankruptcy in 1989 due to a business failure, nearly 30 years ago, how long should I keep having to tell people? How long should I have to keep telling everyone? Does it matter today?

I think current finance, if on any watch lists, etc, is limit.

32 posted on 12/27/2018 10:40:25 AM PST by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bgill

It will probably only be enforced for conservative landlords.


34 posted on 12/27/2018 10:41:44 AM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson