To: blueyon
The Supremes have ruled on this before. No duty to protect any one individual. DemocRATS will never acknowledge this as they try and disarm Americans while they put more felons on the streets who have more rights than law abiding Americans.
10 posted on
12/19/2018 9:57:47 AM PST by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: AlaskaErik
The Supremes have ruled on this before. No duty to protect any one individual. DemocRATS will never acknowledge this as they try and disarm Americans while they put more felons on the streets who have more rights than law abiding Americans.
They overstep so far this will be their undoing. Youcant have it both ways. Either you want the public to wholly disarm, only butter knives allowed in the home, or you can defend that police are not bound to help them. Can’t have both.
28 posted on
12/19/2018 10:10:14 AM PST by
Yaelle
To: AlaskaErik
“No duty to protect any one individual..”
Oh they will protect all right....up to the point their own ass might be in danger.
63 posted on
12/19/2018 10:54:11 AM PST by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneoFormer FBI SA outs Mueller and McCabe over their “unethical” tactics used against Mi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson