Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Psalm 73

What are the pros/cons of ducted/non-ducted/ortho’d/whatever?


4 posted on 12/19/2018 6:51:04 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Calvin Locke
"What are the pros/cons..."

Never worked on a helo w/ a ducted tail rotor - and not a design engineer, but it just doesn't look natural. Like something one might find on a cute little French helicopter....

7 posted on 12/19/2018 7:10:18 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("I will now proceed to entangle the entire area".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Calvin Locke

Quieter, better protected, more aerodynamic during cruse. But heavier, more expensive, less power during hover.


8 posted on 12/19/2018 7:11:23 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Calvin Locke

Calvin Locke:

“What are the pros/cons of ducted/non-ducted/ortho’d/whatever?”

Pros are that the Fenestron type enclosed tail rotors have a lower noise signature than a traditional tail rotor and are less susceptible to incidental damage than a traditional non-enclosed tail rotor.

As for cons - the Fenestron type tail rotors are slightly more mechanically complex than a traditional tail rotor, but that is more than made up for by the reduced noise and protection of the tail rotor shroud.


10 posted on 12/19/2018 7:28:17 AM PST by jhastey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson