Posted on 12/18/2018 2:11:53 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Check freepmail...
Thank you for responding.
I am among those who consider this q stuff to be qanonsense. So I ignored those threads. I only entered one of the threads when you guys posted up a qthread on Inauguration Day. I had no idea that you guys had attained some sort of protected status, the same sort of protected status that Little jeremiah and I had tried to attain on those important Certifigate threads.
If ever there was a day that q got wrong, it was inauguration day. On inauguration day in 2009, I posted the Cetifigate Postmortem thread.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2168149/posts
But on the inauguration day that proved Q wrong, you guys posted your own DIG IN thread that acted as a bugzapper and you abused your protected status. I got a timeout due to your aggregious actions on Free Republic. Hubris on your part. I don’t appreciate it, but that’s water under the bridge. Now my interest is in attaining that same sort of status for cold fusion and perhaps other controversial subjects that end up making FR appear kooky.
We’re not going to agree.
Poor form on your part to use my comments, meant to be helpful, to take shots at me, Q etc.
But you do you.
That is why we need a Free Republic voluntary ideological litmus test matrix.
I used your comments?
Taking shots at q is perfectly valid. Except on your qanon threads, which is what I’m getting at.
forgot to ping you
I dunno what Delphi techniques are.
Here’s a FR article, there may be more. Plus searching online. You’ll recognize some of this.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3250091/posts
Using the Delphi Technique to Achieve Consensus
Based on Hegelian dialectic.
I am not a fan.
The famous interaction with professor Hegel and one of his students went like this:
But Herr Hegel, the facts are otherwise.
Hegel: Then so much worse for the facts.
Vendome, you are mentioned in this post. I am asking for the same status that the qanon threads have attained, such a status that I was given a timeout due to my interactions on Inauguration Day when QANON was proven simply wrong.
In contrast, on inauguration day 2009, I posted the Certifigate PostMortem thread. Somw weird new principle is in play and I cannot identify it.
I did not aim for agreement. I asked how you attained protected caucus status on a secular subject.
In the past, we had asked to generate such a status on Certifigate threads and on Cold Fusion threads. We were denied. How did you overcome that?
That was a few years back and I asked we start collecting information on Antifa.
I didn’t know there were already groups doing this.
I contributed as it is a patriotic and law enforcement issue.
Can’t name the groups
You have to find then and join.
You can them on reddit and 4chan.
How did this secular caucus protection level on FR come to be? No one seems to want to address this question.
I seek the same protection on Cold Fusion threads. We sought that level of protection on Certifigate threads and were denied.
Probably shoulda pinged you to this post.
I thought the cold fusion threads were fun, even though I disagree.
Factually they are dumb but, I enjoyed the give and take repartee and was forced to consider various opinions.
Dunno how they ended up in the thought police camp.
FR is great because we are really great at challenging facts.
I hope the mods will reconsider
Thank you for your feedback.
It all makes me so..... tired. So much to unite, so much to divide. State your case. Make it count on the facts, not the opinion. Most people are listening, here on this forum. Bring your best.
A six month bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.