To: qaz123
So, basically he was under investigation, they didnt let him know that he was under investigation, they didnt advise him of his Miranda Warnings and they interviewed him, under those circumstances anyway.When the FBI shows up and starts asking you about your actions a prudent person might conclude that he was under investigation.
Further, Miranda warnings are for people in custody, not officials sitting in the White House sitting for a voluntary interview.
The FBI's behavior was routine and the same as takes place with every law enforcement agency at every level in America.
They may have been more successful than they often are but that's due to a combination of disorganization and arrogance on the part of the Administration and Flynn, not unethical FBI behavior.
22 posted on
12/18/2018 12:26:36 PM PST by
semimojo
To: semimojo; qaz123
Heaven forbid that a former US general decorated with the Bronze Star w/3 oak leaf clusters think that he's not an enemy of the US government!
He should have brought an entire platoon of lawyers in battle-rattle.
What was he thinking? How disorganized.
Are you ALWAYS a supercilious gasbag, semimojo? ![thinking face](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f914.png)
26 posted on
12/18/2018 12:31:39 PM PST by
kiryandil
(Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
To: semimojo
I disagree. I believe it is unethical to set traps for people who have committed no other crime by asking them about conversations you already have full access to.
The job of the FBI is to investigate crimes that have occurred, not create elaborate ruses that result in new process crimes.
58 posted on
12/18/2018 3:15:39 PM PST by
Jack Black
("If you believe in things that you don't understand then you suffer" - "Superstition",Stevie Wonder)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson