I can’t see where he did anything wrong. Talking with a Russian...even about some future policy...is speculative in nature. It’s not like there was a written agreement between them...And Flynn had absolutely no power. He was a spokesperson.
I spoke to a Russian waitress at Perkins last week. Ordered a ham and cheese omelette. Don’t tell mueller.
The document starts with Flynn in 2013. It really had to be urgent for Comey (ordered by BHO) to send a couple of agents over shortly after the inauguration to start talking about 2013. Surely they could have done this when Flynn was working for oBozo?
If Muleface sent me as judge this document and no accompanying unredacted document, I would rule in favor of Flynn without explaining why.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5633260/12-17-18-Redacted-Flynn-Interview-302.pdf
I read through it and my takeaway is that he did nothing wrong and seems to have been mislead into not understanding that he was a target and was perhaps a witness or other non-targeted source of information...
What I find unbelievable is that in 2017/2018 the FBI refuses to video or otherwise record interviews and that they rely upon hand written notes and even in the first 302 it was transcribed from notes 3 weeks after the interview... AND THOSE NOTES CERTAINLY WEREN’T AS DETAILED AS THE REPORT... THE AUTHOR OF THE REPORT IS RELYING UPON HIS MEMORY... Secondly... Both 302 reports certainly appear to have been created on EXACTLY THE SAME TYPEWRITER... I am seeing the same light and dark patterns from platen wear and the capital “K” has the same fading on the lower right leg.. also the capital “R” shows the same abnormality... I’m not going to spend more time on it but this stinks...