Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton

it’s still a tax (especially in Roberts mind).

And yes you can have a 0% tax. Look it up.
**********************************************
Well, fortunately you weren’t the judge doing the legal/constitutional analysis & opinions. I’ll stay with the judge on this.


227 posted on 12/16/2018 11:35:13 AM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: House Atreides

On Free Republic, it is fashionable to say bad things about Justice Roberts.

After all the prayer vigil and everything he defied the will of Free Republic and judged in favor of Obamacare because it was actually a tax.

Even though it is not stilla tax, the anti Roberts dogma still prevails.


228 posted on 12/16/2018 11:38:55 AM PST by bert ( (KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Invade Honduras. Provide a military government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

To: House Atreides

Unfortunately the opinion that determines the outcome is John Robert’s. I believe he will try to save Obamacare, especially the part that doesn’t depend on more people buying private health insurance (the option to expand Medicaid). What has changed since the passing of the 2017 tax reform law is the mandatory requirement that most people must purchase private health insurance to avoid a tax penalty. John Roberts may loosen the states’ control of health insurance premiums because health insurance companies will claim that less young and healthy people buy private insurance now so they have to boost prices.


238 posted on 12/17/2018 8:19:09 AM PST by convoter2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson