Posted on 12/14/2018 8:30:16 AM PST by Kaslin
WASHINGTON - Throughout Donald Trump’s campaign for the presidency, he repeatedly promised to build a high, impenetrable, concrete wall along America’s nearly 2,000-mile border with Mexico.
And he further promised that it wouldn’t cost American taxpayers one red cent, saying he would make Mexico pay for it. “Who’s going to pay for the wall?,” he asked legions of supporters at his campaign rallies, who yelled back in unison: “Mexico!”
How could a U.S. president force Mexico — a sovereign nation and a major trading partner — to pay for it? Trump didn’t say, and his supporters didn’t ask, even though the president of Mexico and his predecessors said they would never pay for its construction. And that’s their position to this very day.
During his campaign, Trump met with a group of past and present Mexican heads of state near the border, and when the meeting broke, reporters asked what they had told him about the wall. “It never came up,” Trump replied.
When the president of Mexico came out to meet with reporters, who told him what Trump had said, he replied, “Is he kidding? That was the first subject I brought up.”
But it wasn’t long before Trump knew he couldn’t make good on his promise, and soon after his inauguration he was asking Congress to foot the bill and cough up tens of billions of tax dollars from America’s taxpayers to pay for it.
After all, Congress was entirely controlled by Trump’s party, and surely they’d come up with some seed money to get it started. It hasn’t happened.
The House and the Senate resisted, not only refusing to include any money for the wall in its budget, while offering just a billion or so for general border security, saying that the funds could only be used to build or maintain existing fencing, but not for a concrete wall.
But that didn’t stop Trump from declaring victory for his imaginary wall. Just as he had convinced voters he would force Mexico to pay for it, he began telling his supporters earlier this year that “We’ve started building our wall,” he said in a speech on March 29. “I’m so proud of it.”
His statement was flat out, undeniably, utterly false.”
“Despite the facts, which have been cited numerous times by fact-checkers, Trump repeated his false assertion about an imaginary wall 86 times in the seven months before the midterm elections,” ace fact checker Glenn Kessler reported Tuesday, “according to a database of false and misleading claims maintained by The Washington Post.”
Kessler, who’s become nationally famous for his “Four-Pinocchio” awards to politicians who have trouble with the truth, has awarded them to Trump so many times, that he has had to come up with a special award for him: “The Bottomless Pinocchio.”
“The president keeps going long after the facts are clear, in what appears to be a deliberate effort to replace the truth with his own, far more favorable, version of it. He is not merely making gaffes or misstating things; he is purposely injecting false information into the national conversation,” he writes.
For example, “Trump has 40 times asserted that a wall was needed to stem the flow of drugs across the border — a claim that is contradicted by the Drug Enforcement Administration which says most illicit drugs come through legal points of entry. Traffickers conceal the drugs in hidden compartments within passenger cars or hide them alongside legal cargo in tractor trailers and drive the illicit substances right into the United States,” he says.
In addition, the deadly drug fentanyl “can be easily ordered online, even directly from China.”
Other claims Trump has repeatedly made includes his statements that the U.S. “has the worst immigration laws in terms of keeping immigrants out,” Kessler writes. “That’s simply not true. In fact, the United States has among the world’s most restrictive immigration laws.”
But Trump showed no sign of abandoning his imaginary wall this week when he met with Democratic leaders in the Oval Office Tuesday, threatening to shut down the federal government if Congress does not include his request for $5 billion in start up wall funding.
But Democrats are offering little more than $1.3 billion, though only for fencing, and told him, in effect, that he will likely take the blame if he follows through on his threat.
The bottom line is simply this: neither Republicans nor Democrats want this wasteful wall built. And for the time being, Trump’s wall exists only in his imagination.
Whatever a barrier on the southern border costs is a lot cheaper than losing our country.
“The bottom line is simply this: neither Republicans nor Democrats want this wasteful wall built. And for the time being, Trump’s wall exists only in his imagination.”
He must hang out with the (now defunct) Weekly Standard crowd.
Lambro is so inconsequential I thought he was dead. And, to be realistic, Trump’s trade pact with Mexico and Canada has cost Mexico plenty.
The bottom line is simply this: neither Republicans nor Democrats want this wasteful wall built.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It’s only “wasteful” to those who want the USA fundamentally transformed into North Mexico.
He’s right that that would include most of the elected GOP and Democrats.
It’s the citizens that have no representation other than President Trump that want to retain the rule of law and our country.
The most obvious funding source is taxing remittances to Mexico. Why in the world this hasn’t happened yet mystifies me.
That’s ridiculous. Fentanyl is a Scedule II narcotic and very tightly controlled. No way can it be “easily ordered online.”
What you’ll get direct from China is probably not fentanyl, and it’s likely produced with no regulation or oversight. Good luck with that random grab-bag chemical. Save on shipping and buy from your nearest corner dealer.
Fentanyl is “deadly” when abused. So are lots of things, like drinking too much water.
Interesting article photo...how the seam aligns with our President’s neck...
Just another A-hole who takes Trump literally, but never seriously.
The border is a mess, its a security risk, a health risk and an economic risk.
Many of people on government aid in the US were not born in this country. This has to stop.
Trump gets it.
The Democrats want more voters, illegal or not, and they will loot the US treasury to do it.
Should we assume that Lambro has no Exterior Doors on his House and his Property is not Fenced?
If the GOP were on the side of the citizens we would have had a fence years ago and Trump would not have been needed.
The writer is correct about one thing, we don’t have even one foot of the Wall President Trump campaigned on, just a bunch of temporary metal barriers.
I haven’t given up yet, my tagline has been unchanged since early 2016
You and me both, pal. Tax ALL remittances to everywhere, and allow non-Mexicans to file for a rebate on the taxes.
It's like this...
the money that illegals suck up from our generous welfare abundances is WAY more than they need to survive here; thus, some goes to MEXICO via transfers.
When the illegals can no long do that, the money stays HERE and builds the wall.
Simple; right?
“Trump didn’t say, and his supporters didn’t ask, “
False.
>>>The writer is correct about one thing, we don’t have even one foot of the Wall President Trump campaigned on, just a bunch of temporary metal barriers
Fake news! The President tweeted on Tuesday, “We have already built large new sections.”
We should see some pictures of this non-existent new wall. Are there any photos?
If the wall isn’t being built,
then what’s this;
https://youtu.be/Odnndq_GOUY
chopped liver?
60,000,000 people voted for the wall.
WE want it built.
Are you trying to tell me that when candidate Trump kept talking about the ‘big beautiful wall’ you had visions of these temporary metal fences?
I sure didn’t.
I had visions of something far more permanent, and far more intimidating.
I assume he's referring to legal immigration, and not the illegal immigrant process where someone appears at the border and applies for asylum, but even that seems impossible. I read that we take in more immigrants than the rest of the world combined.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.