CNN Host, Reporter Agree Impeaching Trump Over Sex is Dem Hypocrisy with Icky Witnesses

Newsbusters ^ | December 9, 2018 | P.J. Gladnick

[PJ-Comix]

Michael Isikoff, Chief Investigative Correpondent for Yahoo News, is unable to find any real proof of Trump-Russia collusion based on the latest court filings by Special Counsel Robert Mueller when he appeared on CNN's December 8 Smerconish show, hosted by Michael Smerconish. 

But first, Isikoff agreed with Smerconish on the appearance of Democratic hypocrisy on impeaching over sex. Rep. Jerrold Nadler "eloquently" argued Clinton shouldn't be impeached for lying to conceal an affair with an intern. So how is Nadler going to impeach using sketchy witnesses like Stormy Daniels and Michael Avenatti? 

[PJ-Comix]

Even Michael Isikoff finds NO definitive proof of collusion. So now the Democrats want to impeach Trump for basically the same thing for what the Justice Department dropped charges against John Edwards.

[BenLurkin]

The idea that settling harassment claims violates campaign laws is laughable.

That there are prosecutors so beholden to the Uniparty that they make the assertion, is obscene.

[butlerweave]

Leak Congress’s taxpayer funded Sex Romp

[goldstategop]

Yup. Let the Democrats impeach Trump for lying about sex.

Even if true, its a private matter. That’s what they said about Clinton.

The country needs to be exposed two years of this nonsense. Let them go for it.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Wont stop the commie left from trying to impeach Trump. The same Dems who have NO problem with Obama’s DOJ(including Lynch and others) who told Comey to exonerate Hillary Clinton regarding the server probe because they wanted her to win the election(Yeah I guess that isnt obstruction of justice LOL) want to impeach Trump because well, they hate his guts. They hate him because he ruined their plans of turning America full commie..and they will stop at NOTHING from making sure America becomes the Communist utopia they envision

[humblegunner]

So how is Nadler going to impeach using sketchy witnesses like Stormy Daniels and Michael Avenatti?

I don't know, Mr. Journalist.

Why don't you just tell me?

[goldstategop]

Let’s ask Jabba The Hut how many Democrat names are on that list.

Not one of those congresscritters has a squeaky clean sex life.

[gov_bean_ counter]

That is only a problem for people of character...

[jmacusa]

Oh yeah.”Icky’’ just like kills everything. If it's ‘’icky’’ like just totally like forget it or whatever. Unless it's ''cute''. "Cute'' is like totally cool. Or whatever.

[kiryandil]

So how is Nadler going to impeach using sketchy witnesses like Stormy Daniels and Michael Avenatti?

Lie like a DemoKKKratzi, how else?

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?

Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?...

The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...

We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation....

"We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

Remember what president Barry the Skidmark did with the Tea Party and the IRS.

If the Deep Staters regain control of the government, they WILL use our voting records and other records to come after all of us.

Our choice is simple.

It's us or them.

#ItsUsOrThem

[capydick]

Spikey Speaks

[oldasrocks]

This ought to get interesting considering all the taxpayer money that has been spent by Congress over the years for hush money. Trump need to publish that list with names and amounts and see who get throw where.

[Huskrrrr]

Congress has it’s own “Hush fund.”

[KyCats]

Clinton didn’t just lie. He lied under oath. And his transgression was serious enough to also cost him his law license.

[grey_whiskers]

“Give Me Liberty or Give Them Death.” <— updated.

[NonValueAdded]

I still say the relatively small sum of hush money is simply a “go away, it’s not worth the cost of litigation” payment rather than a true settlement. SeeBS paid out, what over $5M? That’s real smoke indicating fire.

[montag813]

The country needs to be exposed two years of this nonsense. Let them go for it.

Would be just the ticket to get Trump's approval ratings into the 60s, as it did to clinton's.

[montag813]

The country needs to be exposed two years of this nonsense. Let them go for it.

Would be just the ticket to get Trump's approval ratings into the 60s, as it did to clinton's.

[Califreak]

Hmm...

CNN?

Are they laying groundwork to launch the demonic duo under the bus?

[Flick Lives]

This ought to get interesting considering all the taxpayer money that has been spent by Congress over the years for hush money. Trump need to publish that list with names and amounts and see who get throw where.

These ass h*&$ want to get into high puritanical mode? Well then, lets get it *all* out in the open. I want a complete list of Congress scum and how much hush money was paid out of public funds. I want the list of FBI agents who took bribes and favors from the MSM. And I want a list of the MSM persons involved in these bribes.