Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge suggests Justice, State colluded to protect Hillary Clinton in email scandal
Washington Examiner ^ | December 7, 2018 | by Paul Bedard

Posted on 12/07/2018 12:28:05 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

A federal judge has raised speculation that Hillary Rodham Clinton and her State Department “colluded” to keep her missing emails secret from the public and courts, an escalation of scrutiny into Obama-era scandal.

Senior District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth in a new memo also called the Clinton email affair “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

"Lamberth ruled:

… the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to plan discovery into (a) whether Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA; (b) whether the State Department’s attempts to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and (c) whether State has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s requests.

Terming Clinton’s use of her private email system, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” Lamberth wrote in his MEMORANDUM OPINION:

… his [President Barack Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell far short. So far short that the court questions, even now, whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal [Obama announced standard for transparency]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails? And has State ever adequately searched for records in this case?

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2018election; 2020election; benghazi; clinton; election2016; election2018; election2020; email; jamescomey; judicialwatch; libya; lisapage; obamanation; peterstrzok; rico; robertmueller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Liz

Thanks for that explanation.


41 posted on 12/07/2018 1:32:45 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned
and 99% of American media.

Which includes "conservative" pundits.

42 posted on 12/07/2018 1:37:51 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Y/V/W.


43 posted on 12/07/2018 1:41:03 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Looks like only the judge and congress didn’t know about that.


44 posted on 12/07/2018 1:48:21 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Father God, we pray in the name of Jesus, that you protect this judge, and others like him, from those who would do them harm. Amen.


45 posted on 12/07/2018 1:55:11 PM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

All valid and important questions. They will never be answered. This is just a new dog & Pony show. Having the Defendants decide if they were corrupt is not really the way to go here. Need Pompeo and Whittaker to step up to the plate and that will never happen.


46 posted on 12/07/2018 2:38:16 PM PST by DrDude (The Plan- No Plan! No Plan going forward either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

bookmark


47 posted on 12/07/2018 3:42:22 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Bttt.

5.56mm


48 posted on 12/07/2018 3:43:39 PM PST by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Unlike republicans, the dems will probably try to get this judge unseated for his remarks.


49 posted on 12/07/2018 3:53:58 PM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson