Yeah, but we have trouble getting the numbers correct after a natural disaster. So exactly how does he come up with this claim? Also, man was not the cause of that occurrence, if it actually happened, and won't be if his warning proves correct. Needless to say, I am highly skeptical of his "models" just as I am of all the other "models" that have proven themselves to be as wrong as can be. Yawn.
the other thing is- back then, (according to long age theorists) the CO2 level in atmosphere was near 1000 ppm- and animals and plantlife still thrived- I don’t believe in long earth age, but we did have periods when the earth atmosphere was near 1000 ppm, yet life thrived- scientists today are ‘assuring everyone’ that 450 i believe it is, ppm is the ‘tipping point’, the ‘point of no return’ blah blah blah-
also ice core samples prove that warming happens 100’s of years BEFORE CO2 rises- therefore CO2 is NOT causing warming- other causes are the reason- Yet they have BS’d the world to think CO2 is the cause of warming
We saw france rebel against their government for trying to enact a ‘fuel tax’ recently- exposing the real reason for all this idiotic science behind the fictional ‘man-caused’ climate change- it’;s nothing but a giant scam to lien the pockets of governments around the world