Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank
A lot of people thought that it would be impossible to have such a huge consensus of scientists and universities suppressing information and creating science hoaxes; therefor evolution theory must be valid.

Then came Global Warming.
2 posted on 12/05/2018 11:14:58 AM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: \/\/ayne

I love how you made your name be mixed font....

That being said, when measured against proper objective scientific criteria, TToE meets all of them. It is not a consensus, it is science. The fact people who know REAL science make up the vast majority of scientists who understand that is not a consensus (which has no meaning in science).

AGW OTOH meets exactly zero criteria for a Scientific Theory. In fact, it meets exactly zero criteria for a Scientific HYPOTHESIS — it cannot even be stated as a proper H0.

AGW is the perfect example of science on its head. politicians decided on the desired outcome, THEN fund studies to meet that outcome. By definition, the studies’ outcome will follow the money.

There is a big difference. Do not conflate the two.


3 posted on 12/05/2018 11:26:49 AM PST by freedumb2003 (As always IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: \/\/ayne

BioLogos invites the church and the world
to see the harmony between science and biblical faith
as we present an evolutionary understanding of God’s creation.

https://biologos.org/


4 posted on 12/05/2018 11:31:42 AM PST by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: \/\/ayne
Then came Global Warming.

Anyone who can read a graph can see that this NOAA doc shows two temperature lines:

BLUE = Actual Temperatures

RED = ADJUSTED TEMPERATURES

The BLUE line shows there are temperature variations from year to year BUT the warmest temperatures were back in the 1930's, not in recedt decades as the PRESSTITUES and "scientists" repeat 24/7.

So where do these geniuses get the story that recent years are the warmest on record? That's easy, the "scientists" adjust recorded tempertures first DOWNWARD to account for LOWER CO2 levels and then UP to account for even higher CO2 levels.

Notice how ADJUSTED and MEASURED tempertures approximately are equal around 2000.

Only a true idiot would believe these con artists. Yes, the political rank are full of idiots. Tell the public that the sky is pink and at least 50% of them will buy that lie too.

8 posted on 12/05/2018 1:33:23 PM PST by politicianslie (OPTIMIST-Glass 1/2 full- PESSIMIST 1/2 empty TO ENGINEER, Glass is twice as big as it needs to be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson