p
Are they there to grab the evidence for destruction?
uranimum one is Mueller.
What did Director Wray have to say about this?
I trust the fbi like I trust the KGB.
Hillary Clinton still runs the DOJ it seems.
Not going after the people who committed the crimes, going after the whistleblower.......
How can anyone have any faith in THIS FBI?
Time to send in the Marines.
Yeah but he had recused himself from anything having to do with the Clintons, the Clinton presidential campaign, Trump, and the Trump presidential campaign and transition.
This was Rosenstein and Wray. Trump pretty much came out and said Sessions was going to be gone after the mid-terms and so the DOJ/FBI acted to cleani up some threats to expose deep state corruption while Sessions was still neutered and out of the way.
Items from Clinton Foundation's Dealings with Russian Uranium
Independent Journal Review | April 2015 | Michael Hausum
FR Posted by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
The New York Times April 2015 published an article about the Clinton Foundation, its receipt of millions of dollars from foreign governments and other interests, and the U.S. government's involvement in Russia's stated goal to expand its control of the world's uranium market.
All while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
The NY Times didn't reach a conclusion, but one question looms very large: As Secretary of State, did Hillary influence an international deal giving a Russian company 20% ownership of America's uranium production, in return for millions of dollars of cash donations to the Clinton Foundation?
Here is a list of 11 questionable items forming a chain of events:
1. September of 2005: Canadian Frank Giustra visits Kazakhstan with Bill Clinton. Days later, his company UrAsia wins a major uranium deal with the country.
2. 2006: Giustra donates $31 million to the Clinton Foundation.
3. February 2007: UrAsia merges with Uranium One and expands into the U.S..
4. June 2008: Russian atomic agency Rosatom begins talks to acquire Uranium One.
5. 2008 to 2010: Uranium One and UrAsia investors donate $8.65 million to Clinton Foundation.
6. June 2009: Rosatom acquires 17% of Uranium One.
7. 2010 to 2011: Millions more donated by Uranium One investors to Clinton Foundation.
8. June 2010: Rosatom requests Committee on Foreign Investment (of which the State Department is a member and its approval is needed) to approve a majority ownership in Uranium One, PROMISING NOT TO PURCHASE 100% of it, NOR TAKE IT PRIVATE.
9. June 2010: Bill Clinton receives $500,000 to speak at a conference held by the Russian investment bank involved in the Rosatom transactions.
10. October 2010: Committee APPROVES Rosatom's request to ACQUIRE A MAJORITY SHARE in Uranium One.
11. January 2013: Rosatom PURCHASES REMAINDER of Uranium One and takes it PRIVATE!.
=================================
The origins of the story were reported in the NY Times in 2008 by Jo Becker, a co-author of the recent NYT piece: Unlike established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton....
Within two days, corporate records show that Mr. Giustra also came up a winner when his company signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by Kazakhstan’s state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom. The monster deal stunned the mining industry, turning an unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars to Mr. Giustra, analysts said.
Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. CLINTON'S charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 MILLION DONATION FROM MR. GUISTRA that had remained a SECRET until he acknowledged it last month. There are intricacies and subtleties to this story that aren't evident in the timeline.
For example, when Hillary assumed the job as Secretary of State, she assented to a limitation of the foundation's international activities and agreed to disclose contributors. It appears, at a minimum, there was incomplete follow-through upon these assurances. Furthermore, those involved in the transactions have denied that any special privileges were sought and that the donations were completely unrelated.
I’m kind of surprised they didn’t “accidentally” shoot him to death.
So...they need to get those docs and shred them all?
Why would FBI seize documents the government already has?
Because its an internal war between factions of the government. Mueller, Clinton, Obama et al want to know what Horowitz and the apparent “white hats” have on them. They can’t wait for some kind of report to be issued, and they certainly can’t wait for indictments. They need to know so they can get out ahead of it and get their stories straight, and discredit witnesses, and throw out parallel conspiracy theories to confuse the issue, and ramp up their press campaign to discredit the whole thing.
So, if they don’t want to lose control of it, Whitaker and any “good guy” FBI he can find, if there are any, and maybe some US Marshalls, need to take control of what they seized. They’d better do it quick before witnesses start dying.
Do we have our first sixteen residents for the newly expanded GTMO retirement facilities?
FBI: The American Gestapo.
Our justice system at the top levels is broken badly. It’s going to take a lot of indictments and firings to right that upside down ship.
In fact the entire government, all 2 million employees, need to be filtered so the bad apples are gone. This nonsense about not being able to fire someone has got to change. Yes, they should have a way to appeal, but if they are dead weight and bog the system down; they do need to hit the road and find a real job.
16 agents raided his home to seize what he was offering to them for years
No doubt wanting to preserve evidence against themselves
Next his lawyer will have his home and office raided
The FBI works for Hillary Clinton
Could not be more obvious
GWP’s article lead-in FAILS to establish that the docuemnts have already been submitted to the congressional committees for investigative purposes.
Seems a bit of sensational-ization is going on here...
1+1=3