Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Baynative

At your link, there’s a link to a sister article. It too tries to portray Mueller in a uber positive light. That second article seems to want to raise expectations that Mueller has an airtight case, that the case would probably last another 6 months (and that this is “fast” for the amount of crime he’s already uncovered- indictments Mueller made). It also says that Mueller could subpoena POTUS or, if he chooses not to have that fight, write a report saying he believes POTUS was involved in collusion. Huh? Is it trying to find an easy way out for Mueller given he doesn’t have anything on POTUS? I’ll put that second link below:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/25/robert-mueller-donald-trump-russia-investigation


25 posted on 11/25/2018 2:49:19 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Thanks for that link. I’m surprised I missed it.


88 posted on 11/25/2018 8:55:38 PM PST by Baynative ("A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams." - John Barrymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson