[samadams2000]

She should really step down and and spend time with her family.

[bramps]

Shedding her mortal coil about now would get the movie some big box office numbers.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

But wait a minute. I thought judges were supposed to be impartial. Balls and strikes and all of that. Right "Chief Justice" Roberts?

[smvoice]

LOL at these b÷÷÷÷÷÷ offering to donate one of their ribs to her!

HEY b÷÷÷÷÷÷! Don’t you know you’re already one rib shy?? It’s the one taken FROM ADAM TO FORM YOUR USELESS BONES!!
DEAL WITH IT!

[2ndDivisionVet]

Her replacement will be nominated, voted upon and settled in before the Republican National Convention. And she won’t be the only one. Mark my words.

[Menehune56]

RBG expected Hillary, the historic first woman president, to nominate her replacement. All the polls said it was in the bag. Surprise!

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Women took to Twitter to offer the justice a rib.

I'll take a couple ribs, some potato salad and chips....maybe a beer.

[Jeff Chandler]

Heck, she’ll probably outlive Hillary.

[Intolerant in NJ]

Hope Justice Roberts get to see it - apparently he’s not as familiar with some of his judges as he should be.....

[ZULU]

Couldn’t POSSIBLY insult the memory of such an OUTSTANDING libturd with a CONSERVATIVE Judge.

Narrative in waiting.

[Ransomed]

Imagine what weekly tests she is getting.

Freegards

[morphing libertarian]

the movie making her a saint will be out soon

[Chode]

It’s not considered polite to point this out, but Ginsburg has been falling asleep on the bench during oral arguments for years. Back in 2006, she dozed off during a redistricting argument for a good 15 minutes—long enough for the courtroom artist to sketch her in repose. The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank wrote, “It’s lucky for Ginsburg that the Supreme Court has so far refused to allow television in the courtroom, for her visit to the land of nod would have found its way onto late-night shows.”

i'm waiting for a lawyer to point out to the court that "I have ONE shot at this and would appreciate it if somebody would wake her up!"

[gcparent]

I boycotted Fox and instead listen to Rush on the radio. Recently, Rush said that millinials refuse to listen to anyone more than 5 years older than themselves. The only exception is RBG. She is the only old person they revere. Once again Rush is right.

[melsec]

“The face of the resistance” well that face has definitely seen some resistance maybe from meeting the tear end of a bus.

[Chipper]

The Cult of Personality. All of this RBG crap is so much evidence of media manipulation, and the power of marketing.

[odawg]

Maybe it is time for someone to check up on her, at her house, to see if she is in fact there, or is sentient and able to do her job.

[NonValueAdded]

has declared her the “face of the resistance” against President Donald Trump’s agenda

Ahem. Hey! Chief Justice Roberts! Should a Supreme Court Justice EVER be ruling on the basis of policy differences? Thought that wasn't in your purview.

CJR, you may be technically correct that a SCJ is not beholden to the President who nominated them, the most recent example is the "Trump" judge who let Acosta back in the White House. But you must concede that there are activist judges, liberal judges, conservative judges, strict constructionists ... I'll bet you could make a list. Try this, CJR: after you make that list, put the name of the President who appointed them next to their name.

What you have done, Chief Justice Roberts, is to repeat the common mistake of interpreting President Trump's remarks literally. Hey, he wasn't talking to YOU, he was talking to US. And we knew EXACTLY what he meant.

The President who made the appointment is a good (albeit not perfect) indicator of whether or not a judge will be wont to legislate from the bench. We see it all the time in articles and even posts on forums, blogs, etc. "Appointed by President ____" is almost always present in the text. Name the President and we know from which philosophy came the ruling. And, yeah, it's not supposed to be that way. BUT IT IS.

[chuckee]

What this woman needs is a remedial course on constitutional law. She votes her politics on the bench and the law takes a back seat to the wishes of the DNC. She is the prime example of why Roberts is wrong when he intimates there are not political judges on the appellate level