1. We are screening them over their safety in Mexico?? (So they are presenting at our border)
2. We are speeding up the process -doubling it.
3. Once we deny the asylum claim, "They remain in US custody pending immediate deportation to his or her home country.**
We have to burden the cost of flying them back to Honduras- expected.
We are giving them a loophole to claim they don’t feel safe in Mexico?
We had better being filling up the plane daily and deporting them by the hundreds, asap.
When it's written that way, it makes Trump outrage sound unjustified.
Shouldn't the word "unvetted" be included?
Shouldn't the 5 or 10% compliance rate with showing up for their asylum hearing under "catch and release" be noted?
Shouldn't the gang issues be noted?
How about welfare and voter fraud?
Wars Over!
Go Home.
An initial screening about staying in Mexico being dangerous sounds like it has to be done while they are still in Mexico. Wouldn’t Mexico have to do that? Are they going to admit that they are dangerous to foreigners?
The asylum seekers “are in danger in Mexico”.
You want to see people in danger? Go to San Francisco. People are pooping on the sidewalks and needles are lying around everywhere!
Excellent. Not sufficient, but a step in the right direction.
It’s good that Mexico is willing to cooperate with the US.
Once the asylum seeking mob realizes they have to live in Mexico for months, awaiting a small chance that they will be admitted (near zero chance for all those young males), we shall see just how “peaceful” they really are... Some will accept their dreams of free stuff in the USA are dashed, and go home. Others will fight. It won’t be much fun in Mexico, like it would have been in the USA.
So what happens when this is announced? Riots?
“The deal, which would overhaul US border policy”
No way! This statement opens up more
push back from the ultra-liberal judges
from the 9th circus. Trump threatened
to shut the border down unless Mexico
is held responsible. This statement is
completely false. Trump can’t overhaul
border policy without approval from
Congress. He’s already tried that, only
to be shot down.
While there could be problems with this deal, a big plus is that it makes a big disincentive for future “caravaners” to embark on the same type of invasion.
One problem I see is that the “asylum seekers” could gin up more reasons why they are eligible for asylum now that they are in Mexico and could be mistreated by the locals.
As we’ve discussed in the past, the incoming far-left President is actually more amenable on immigration than previous administrations.