[WASCWatch]

This vermin confesses, on tape and the jury watched the video. In regard to this animal’s DNA, there was only a one in 6 trillion chance of someone else sharing a genetic profile with the DNA at the scene.

What was his defense? How long was the interrogation before he confessed? I'm not defending the guy; just would like to know these two facts.

[FourtySeven]

I don’t blame you for not reading the article because of all the dang pop ups and other crap the Post always throws up at every hapless visitor, so I’ll answer your questions:

Yes apparently the defense claims that the interrogation went a long time, and the only thing offered to the jury was the recorded confession. They say he confessed to it after brutal hours of questions. So, the answer to that is simple: provide the recording of the entire interrogation. At least to show how long it was and how “brutal”. Shouldn’t be a problem.

As far as the DNA evidence, the defense claims that when the dad found her body, that “contaminated” the crime scene. That’s such a crock it isn’t even funny. His DNA woundnt contaminate anything! It certainly wouldn’t contaminate with the suspect’s DNA!