Posted on 11/17/2018 9:12:46 AM PST by bitt
New text messages show that Roger Stone learned about WikiLeaks plans to release Clinton-related emails through Randy Credico.
The messages, which Stones lawyers extracted from an old phone on Wednesday, back up Stones claims about how he learned of WikiLeaks plans. The messages severely undercut Credicos denials that he was a source for Stone.
Robert Mueller has been investigating whether Stone had advance knowledge of WikiLeaks plans to release emails stolen from John Podesta
~~~ Text messages released on Wednesday appear to support Trump confidant Roger Stones testimony that a New York radio show host was his source for information about WikiLeaks plans to release information damaging to Hillary Clintons campaign.
Julian Assange has kryptonite on Hillary, Randy Credico wrote to Stone on Aug. 27, 2016, according to text messages that Stone provided to The Daily Caller News Foundation.
You are not going to drag my name into this are you, Credico wrote on Sept. 29, 2016, suggesting that he was worried that Stone would identify him as his source for public claims he was making about WikiLeaks plan
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
p
Whoops
thanx for the ping, bitt.
lotta new stuff and new names for me here.
B-b-but Russia!
Right about now, Mueller must feel like the Coyote as Roadrunner Roger Stone flashes by him going “BEEP! BEEP!”
Lol
Michael Caputo interviews Roger Stone and others about Mueller investigation:
INTERESTING about Margaret Ratner Kunstler being in the middle of this. She is a commie lawyer, National Lawyers Guild, from the heart of TWO commie families (Ratner and Kunstler) involved in far-left causes over many years.
She is previously identified publicly as an advisor to WikiLeaks:
https://www.hrbeklaw.com/margaret-ratner-kunstler.html
If Mueller really wanted to go after subversion and treason he should be investigating all of the commies in the Kunstler-Ratner orbits, especially in/around NYC.
Roger Stone is just a Twitter conduit who happened to pick up a bit of juicy gossip about WikiLeaks.
Who in the deep state gave this to Credico?
...TWO commie families (Ratner and Kunstler) involved in far-left causes over many years.
_____________
Two BILLIONAIRE, elitist 1% commie families._If_ this is the Ratner family of property development fame, malls, IIRC, there are long-term social connections to the Chicago Pritzkers.
I am familiar with the NLG, pure commie.
Why would a commiepuke like her be advising Wikileaks? Since they have dirt on Hitlery and other like vermin? From article, wow she is super bad news:
More recently, Kunstler has advised Anonymous, Wiki Leaks and Bradley Manning supporters in connection with grand jury subpoenas, encounters with the FBI, and overcoming fundraising hurdles in the face of corporate obstruction and governmental suppression. An advocate for street protesters and other activists utilizing more modern tools for getting their voices heard, Kunstler fights to protect constitutional rights of demonstrators online and on the street.
Their interest in WikiLeaks pre-dated the Hillary campaign. As the far left (left of Bernie) they would love anything that could undermine US govt, national security etc. When WikiLeaks turned out to be a threat to Hillary they (most of them) probably didn’t care much, just wanted to tear at both major US parties.
[just my speculation, but the far far left usually hates the Democrats about as much as they hate the Republicans... ]
Hmm, Kunstler also a source for Credico. I wonder when.
I have read that Assange is basically an anarchist who hates all government. So that would definitely fit in with Kuntsler’s agenda. Commies like anarchists to help them get the Great Revolution going, and then they line the anarchists up and shoot them later.
Hi.
Where are the Russians?
5.56mm
Thanks for the ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.