Finally someone who thought about it as opposed to just explode on the spot
Except he didn’t. The notion that White House access is “property right thur usage” is another attempt to twist the law to say something it doesn’t. You cannot sell your White House pass. it not “the Journalists”. What it IS, is a grant of privileged access from the President to the Journalist. Based on the law there is utterly NO legitmacy to the decision today.
What this judge said was because the WH allows Journalists access, it cannot BAN this Journalist. That such a intellectually stupid argument it is clear it was not written based on the law but a pathetic attempt to avoid having to make a judgement that would piss off “the press”.
Based on this ruling ANY “Journalist’ must be granted access to the White House because other journalists are granted access. Simply manufacture a “right” out of thin air. NO base in law at all. Just pure made up nonsense by a gutless coward pretending to be a Judge.
Gutless coward just kicked the can down the road rather then doing his duty.
That prior post is unjustifiably sanguine in naively assuming we have an impartial, non-elitist judiciary that does not routinely dispense multi-tiered pseudo-justice based upon political leaning and stature.
That is the kind of post that has been written for two years asserting that Mueller is harmless, or actually working to Trump’s benefit, based upon this or that legal technicality or established precedent. The fixes are in.
Be as smugly condescending as you like toward those citizens who are outraged that a judge has ruled a violation of due process where this is none such, while the actual due process rights of American citizens are being openly destroyed by Robert Mueller. You both are mistaken.