Posted on 11/13/2018 5:03:28 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
“Election officials wouldn’t let me see the ballots. Then they destroyed them, in violation of the law.”
“Are you saying there was fraud?”
“Election officials refused to report the number of votes by the legal deadline. When more votes showed up a day later, we could not find out where they came from.”
“Are you saying there was fraud?”
You cite concrete information on specific, provable violations of the law. But the follow up question is a diversion, refocusing attention. It is accusatory, a challenge to prove something which may be unprovable (if records are destroyed) or at least, need time to investigate.
So let’s get some clarity on this. You don’t have to answer that question. “Election fraud” is a generic term. Laws, however, are specific. You either followed the law or you didn’t.
In the U.S., the law requires federal ballots to be retained for 22 months. Florida Sunshine Law requires that ballots be produced for inspection at the request of any person.
In 2016 Tim Canova ran for U.S. Representative in the Democratic Primary against Debbie Wasserman Schultz. After the election he asked to examine the ballots under Florida Sunshine Law. Broward County did not allow him to see the ballots, stalling month after month until he took them to court. That is a violation of the law. What happened to Canova was obstruction.
When Canova sued to see the ballots, Broward County destroyed them. That is a violation of the law. It is ballot tampering.
(Excerpt) Read more at blackboxvoting.org ...
It is not a question of fraud. It is a question of integrity. Once you have sacrificed integrity fraud is presumed.
But what is the punishment allowed if violating the law. If there is no punishment there might as well be no law.
“In the U.S., the law requires federal ballots to be retained for 22 months. Florida Sunshine Law requires that ballots be produced for inspection at the request of any person.
In 2016 Tim Canova ran for U.S. Representative in the Democratic Primary against Debbie Wasserman Schultz. After the election he asked to examine the ballots under Florida Sunshine Law. Broward County did not allow him to see the ballots, stalling month after month until he took them to court. That is a violation of the law. What happened to Canova was obstruction.
When Canova sued to see the ballots, Broward County destroyed them. That is a violation of the law”
She should be cooling her heels jail.
I just sent an email to Judicial Watch asking them to go after Snipes emails/texts
“Once you have sacrificed integrity fraud is presumed.”
WHEN WILL THE PUBLIC GET THIS THROUGH THEIR HEADS.
The above quoted statement is very important. It’s a lot like computer security; if a system COULD have been compromised, it must be treated AS THOUGH IT -HAS- BEEN COMPROMISED.
Basically, no cast ballots should have been left outside of the immediate joint control/observation of at least one person from each major party. Without that...who knows what could happen (I do! I do!).
The number of ballot integrity failures I’ve seen pointed out in the media are already almost too numerous to count.
Integrity is like virginity. You get one shot at it.
Bev Harris’s, alas, isn’t credible...
Conspiracies are just theories if no one is arrested.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.