To: metmom
There are some crimes that should strip people of their right to vote for life.
Is the accusation enough, or should we wait until he is convicted. Maybe we should go ahead and execute him without even a trial?
5 posted on
11/10/2018 3:29:51 PM PST by
JoSixChip
(He is Batman!)
To: JoSixChip
"Is the accusation enough, ..." The same Democrats who would have denied Kavanaugh a seat on the Supreme Court exert themselves to register people to vote who are awaiting trial for mass murder.
If not for double standards the Democrats would have no standards at all.
To: JoSixChip
Sounds good to me (i think we are pretty sure of who did it), want me to do it for the chicken sh!t stat of FLOR I DUH?
27 posted on
11/10/2018 4:15:40 PM PST by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
To: JoSixChip
Give him a fast trial...then the woodchipper. Some of these murderous oafs last decades in prison before justice finds them.
40 posted on
11/10/2018 4:44:06 PM PST by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: JoSixChip
The reason we're in the mess we're in right now is that we don't have the courage to do just that.
Molly-coddling mass murderers, letting aliens invade and vote by the million, aborting more kids than we raise.
Unsustainable.
This shooter should never have been taken alive.
48 posted on
11/11/2018 2:30:47 AM PST by
caddie
(Tagline: Guten Tag.)
To: JoSixChip
“Maybe we should go ahead and execute him without even a trial?”
No, if he is dead, he will vote Democratic for sure. In Florida the dead not only vote, they can run and win (e.g., the Orange County tax collector’s race in 2012).
55 posted on
11/11/2018 6:59:23 AM PST by
Berosus
(I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson