Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Hillary is not responsible for having a private server set up against the law

"In 2011, a notice to all State employees was sent on Clinton's behalf, which recommended employees avoid conducting State business from personal e-mail accounts due to information security concerns. Clinton stated she did not recall this specific notice, and she did not recall receiving any guidance from State regarding email policies."

That's from the Hill. She also claims that her server was more secure than using a private email service like gmail. What exactly is actionable here? It is guidance, not a law. It was claimed to be more secure (even though it was not).

90 posted on 11/10/2018 8:41:43 AM PST by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

Your claim that the handling of top secret information is only guidance (not a law), says a lot more than I need to say.

There are numerous criminal codes covering these matters.


94 posted on 11/10/2018 9:03:31 AM PST by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 frm 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson