[palmer]

If you have to rely on humans reading and counting ANYTHING, you open things up to errors and very easy fraud. You can't "throw out" electronic votes. You can't "find" electronic votes. And you can't miscount or misread them.

You have it completely backwards. Paper is secure, as long as provenance is maintained. If it is not, then the ballots should not be counted. Paper ballots can be burned out back in the firepit, but paper doesn't burn very well in dense stacks.

In contrast the electronic records are completely at the mercy of the admins. And the admins are cheating, lying Dems.

[JediJones]

There’s nothing secure about paper at all. No modern company runs on paper.

Look at these mail-in ballots where signatures have to be verified. Signatures can be faked. And GOP ballots can be thrown out at will because the counter didn’t “believe” the signatures matched.

A machine can be made entirely secure. It all depends how good the design is. It can even do a retinal scan for each vote to make sure the same person doesn’t vote twice. It’s just a matter of how many safeguards you want to put into it.