Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Napalitano is wrong in saying saying that Trump's new acting AG is not legally qualified to be acting AG because his current position is not one that requires confirmation by the Senate. He is referring to USC 3345. He stops at section (a)(2) which says :

(2) notwithstanding paragraph (1), the President (and only the President) may direct a person who serves in an office for which appointment is required to be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to perform the functions and duties of the vacant office temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346; OR

He fails to read on to section (a)(3) which clearly states that he can appoint him:

3) notwithstanding paragraph (1), the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee of such Executive agency to perform the functions and duties of the vacant office temporarily in an acting capacity, subject to the time limitations of section 3346, if—

(A) during the 365-day period preceding the date of death, resignation, or beginning of inability to serve of the applicable officer, the officer or employee served in a position in such agency for not less than 90 days; and

(B) the rate of pay for the position described under subparagraph (A) is equal to or greater than the minimum rate of pay payable for a position at GS–15 of the General Schedule.

Under this section he doesn't have to be in a position that requires Senate approval.He meets the conditions required in this section

62 posted on 11/09/2018 4:13:59 AM PST by TheCipher (To my mind Judas Iscariot was nothing but a low, mean, premature Congressman. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheCipher
Your research was good, but you are missing the point.

Napolitano's point -- which was reinforced by Justice Thomas in his 2017 concurring opinion in the NLRB case -- is that Section (a)(3) of that statute is unconstitutional. In fact, the idea that Congress can override a Constitutional requirement by allowing "temporary" appointments based on GS pay scales is laughable.

70 posted on 11/09/2018 4:29:46 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson