U.S. appeals court rules against Trump on DACA immigration program

Reuters ^ | November 8, 2018 | by Tom Hals

[ealgeone]

What’s the point of elections or the Constitution?

[Red Badger]

A U.S. appeals court in California..........................stopped reading at that point.................

[dljordan]

How is it that the courts run the immigration system?

[heterosupremacist]

9th circuit strikes again...

[libstripper]

No surprise. Time for SCOTUS to reverse.

[grobdriver]

Screw that.

Supreme court, here we come.

[liberalh8ter]

Obama’s EO’s, no matter how illegal, cannot be overturned. President Trump should just issue his own EO that does the opposite of Obama’s. Then watch the hilarity ensue.

[Ciaphas Cain]

Obama is still the President, according to the Ninth Circus apparently.

[xzins]

This is another reason that Sessions is gone. He couldn’t win cases involving the president using the same power every other president has used. Granted, it’s the 9th circuit, but still, a president’s executive orders have to do with how he wishes to execute certain laws.

[Leep]

California..didn’t they use to be part of the US?

[vespa300]

Soon to be Slapped down by D.C. California courts are masochists. They love to be slapped. They get off on it. I admit, I like watching it too.

[Stevenfo]

Trump didn’t stop the program, it expired. Are these judges saying the expiration is invalid?

[Theoria]

It was never a EO. Obama nor Trump issued a EO. It’s only policy.

[Mariner]

The 9th Circuit rules that a POTUS can bind all other future POTUS with an Executive Order.

Impeach these retards.

[heterosupremacist]

Stevenfo wrote:

*Trump didn’t stop the program, it expired. Are these judges saying the expiration is invalid?*

That appears to be exactly what they are saying, good reply!

[liberalh8ter]

From the DHS website on the DACA page:

“The Obama administration chose to deploy DACA by Executive Branch memorandum—despite the fact that Congress affirmatively rejected such a program in the normal legislative process on multiple occasions. The constitutionality of this action has been widely questioned since its inception.”

[bert]

Hmmmm........ Prediction
SCotus will rule for the President 5 to 3

[arrogantsob]

Oh yeah. I’m sure the House will impeach judges.

[antidemoncrat]

Liberal judges continue to think they are now the Legislative Branch. This was an executive decision made by Obiewan Obama and can be undone by executive decision.