I think the fact that the House margin is that narrow is a victory in itself, considering how we limited the losses.
And if I read this right, the ones who lost were RINOs—those who didn’t try to sabotage the House by retiring as well.
So in other words, the House is almost exactly the same as before, just with an outright globalist as Speaker instead of a hidden globalist.
A loss is still as loss.
You’ll probably find that most GOP House losses were in districts that Hillary Clinton won in 2016. A RINO was probably the best you’re ever going to get in those places.
What you said.