I tell you what - if the Convention of States happens - and they ONLY do what the Convention of States is (supposedly) called to do - the limited job of addressing the couple of things supposedly listed - and all is well at the end, I will gladly post an admission of my error with an apology to thinking less of those who supported the Convention.
IF
You and the rest of those who support the Convention are willing to do the same if the Convention goes awry...
While I have taken the time to analyze Huldah, JBS, and Schlafly, I’ve found Article V opponents to be particularly resistant to even reading columns that may upset their mindset.