Posted on 11/02/2018 6:03:01 PM PDT by markomalley
Early voting except for NV has been R+. Ds are narrowly ahead there.
Its possible they could catch up with in-person voting on Electikn Day but they would have to beat their 2016 numbers.
The polls of course are D+. Maybe pollsters are seeing something the early vote hasn’t revealed.
We’ll find out the truth on Tuesday.
I agree with Auroralea. I’ve seen the exact opposite
We will gain seats
Bank on it
Each house race is local and individual
Very hard to beat incumbents
BTTT!
From your fingers to God’s doings!
I always poll democrat. I hope I am not alone. I tell them I am Mary jo (kopechne).
I listened to Cook’s speech on C-Span last nite. He discussed the ’16 election, and it was, unfortunately, pretty credible sounding. He pointed out that ’16 presidential election pivoted on small margins in three states - PA, WI, and MI - which the polling just didn’t pick up. It is a blessing that those three states turned the way they did. He did preface his remarks by saying that polling isn’t as good as it used to be, because people screen out telemarketing phone calls now.I sure hope he’s wrong about Tuesday, because his prediction includes bad results not only in the House but down ballot and in some governorships.
We couldn’t possibly be having all this trouble with commies in the Democrat Party if not for the fact that wire service journalism is a conspiracy against the public. The AP has to be sued into oblivion, IMHO. The NY Times v. Sullivan decision which makes it hard for Democrat as well as Republican politicians to sue for libel - as well as the First Amendment itself - is predicated on the assumption of heterogeneity in journalism. The wire services invalidate that premise - and the Democrats go along and get along.
I've noticed all the articles about how youths can't even bother to vote absentee because they don't know how to buy stamps. Or their cat is sick. Or something.
True, but 40 Rinos retired opening up those seats. Dems will take at a majority of them as those districts were flooded with money and the Republican candidates are weak.
That’s it!!! LOL how did you know that?
Is the Cook Report truly non-partisan? I see many left-wing references to its non-partisanship, but I also see a lot of leftie tilt in its conclusions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.