Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shelterguy
Due to a recent Supreme Court decision . . .The democrats/ judges took their shot and lost.

It is NEVER over for the left. All they need is a 'rat judge to rule the caravanistas can come in. They will be allowed in until the whole thing ends up at the SCOTUS again in a year or two. SCOTUS will rule in favor of the Trump administration but the illegals will NEVER be sent back.

Rinse and repeat.

9 posted on 10/27/2018 10:03:25 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Every time a lefty cries "racism", a Trump voter gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Chandler

Not at all. President Trump can tell any judge to pound sand.


10 posted on 10/27/2018 10:09:58 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler

Jeff, lol, you may, in the end, be right. But, I think that most freepers agree with me that “Trump” can be trusted to not let that happen.

My dad used to tell me a long time ago in situations like this...”son, there’s a long way to slip between the cup and the lip”. And these 14,000 pawns of The Left have a lonnnnngggg way to go.

I guarantee you that “No Sleep Trump” is meeting with his most capable people, civilian and military, and they are formulating a PLAN.


11 posted on 10/27/2018 10:14:07 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler

Stop this from happening time after time. Get a conservative judge today to rule they can’t come in.


17 posted on 10/27/2018 11:36:54 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know. how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
It is NEVER over for the left. All they need is a 'rat judge to rule the caravanistas can come in. They will be allowed in until the whole thing ends up at the SCOTUS again in a year or two.

The President has it within his statutory and constitutional authority to suspend all grants of asylum, should he choose to do so. This was reaffirmed by the SCOTUS in June of this year, in the case, Trump v. Hawaii, No. 17-965 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

“8USC 1182(f) and 1185(a) By its terms, §1182(f) exudes deference to the President in every clause. It entrusts to the President the decisions whether and when to suspend entry, whose entry to suspend, for how long, and on what conditions. It thus vests the President with “ample power” to impose entry restrictions in addition to those elsewhere enumerated in the INA.”

The above language from the Supreme Court ruling essentially says that lower court judges can no longer interfere with the President's lawful execution of his duties, as regards immigration.

24 posted on 10/27/2018 12:04:38 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson