Has this penal code been used to convict those who denigrate Christianity? Somehow I doubt it.
Hey judgie,wudgie, what word should we use to describe a man married to a 6 year old?
With allies like the EU, who needs enemies.
BTW, if you think this is bad, get a load of Articles 11 and 13, the link tax and the meme ban.
So the Austian’s have freedom of speech unless the subject that speech is of a “particularly sensitive nature,” and, or it could “disturb the religious peace in their country?”
Have I got that right?
Mohammed was a slave master and a warlord with a child bride.
an anti-Christ incarnate
“feelings”
Europeans still don’t seem to get the meaning of free speech. These judges certainly don’t.
Every atheist in the EU then is guilty of this law like Richard Dawkins.
Do those statements of fact come under free speech?
“an abusive attack on the Prophet of Islam which could stir up prejudice and threaten religious peace.”
Islam. Religious peace??
You can always bring up a topic by reminding people to not bring up that topic. For instance, “And when talking about Muhammad, please show respect and let’s not call him a pedophile and let’s not dwell upon his child bride, peace be upon her, or a even refer to him, as some have, as a camel f*cker”
It is a declaration that Islam it too brittle--too fragile--to withstand insults.
If Islam cannot be insulted, then it cannot be examined. And if it cannot be examined, the question raised is "why not?" "Is it too weak to withstand examination?"
All this leads people to wonder if Islam is a contrived, vulnerable, and, ultimately, false narrative.
Austria's best known citizen vass Chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945.
To Hell with Austria and their "penal code"!
European Court of Human Rights = clones of the rabid Nazi judge Roland Freisler who was hanged at Nuremberg.
A second Dark Age is descending upon Europe. As with the 1st Dark Age, there will be a few fortresses of civilization, Hungary, Poland, which will hold out as the rest is destroyed and reduced to 3rd world conditions. After 500 or so years, these citadels of civilization can rebuild on the charred remains.
Fine, don’t call that murderius brigand a pedophile - just mention that he screwed a 9-year-old girl, and ask what we would call such a person today? Let the offended arsehole utter the verboten word. They want to play stupid word games, let them - there are easy ways around that.
Translation:
We are scared that ruling that free speech means free speech will mean things start blowing up.
Also - we really should have thought more about bringing in thousands of them.
This is why we created America, though the liberal idiots don’t understand that. I’d say being told what “isn’t covered” by free speech is worth a revolution.
How about “lying homicidal baby raper”?
Screw that panel, and the pedophile Mooohammed.
So, calling a turd a turd, and a thief a thief, and a pig a pig is okay; but calling a pedophile a pedophile is illegal?
This is the final nail in the take over of Europe.