Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

That’s if you fit the original British powerplant. The ship was designed to use the standard US Navy LM2500 power packs as an alternative/fallback and those are actually a big performance improvement, as was the Type 45. The reason the type 26 is slow is because they decided to fit it with the hybrid diesel-electric CODLAG drive system. Not so great - swap that out for LM2500s and the speed problem is solved.


6 posted on 10/19/2018 11:09:55 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

Which shipyard ?


7 posted on 10/20/2018 5:26:53 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr

” swap that out for LM2500s and the speed problem is solved.”

Can she carry enough fuel to keep those turbines turning for 7000 miles?

Just wondering.

If fitted with the LM2500s and US weapons systems, THEN she would be a fine ship. But it’s more of a Destroyer than a Frigate at 6,900 tons.

The US needs 50 Frigates in the 4,000 ton class. Small, cheap and capable. 48 VLS tubes, and integrates with Aegis.

I’m a big fan of the National Security Cutter platform by HI.

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-04/its-time-sea-control-frigate


8 posted on 10/20/2018 6:41:50 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson