Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are Expecting a Baby
Kensington Palace ^ | 15 Oct 2018

Posted on 10/15/2018 1:25:22 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

Their Royal Highnesses The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are very pleased to announce that The Duchess of Sussex is expecting a baby in the Spring of 2019.

Their Royal Highnesses have appreciated all of the support they have received from people around the world since their wedding in May and are delighted to be able to share this happy news with the public.

(Excerpt) Read more at royal.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: baby; harry; markle; meghan; meghanmarkle; princeharry; royala; royalbaby; royals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: tuffydoodle

“That’s what grifters do.”

Agreed. I wonder how long this “marriage” is going to last.


21 posted on 10/15/2018 5:01:16 AM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on behalf of animals would do so on behalf of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bigredkitty1

The Royal Family has become Hollywood East since the Charles/Diana/Camille disaster.

Markle’s father and sister are feeding the media appetite and reflecting poorly on her ‘American’ roots.

As for Markle herself, she should have never worn a white wedding dress in a Christian church - divorced and not a virgin.

The coverage of this marriage is all-consuming and will continue until it ends.


22 posted on 10/15/2018 5:02:41 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Life is prickly - carry tweezers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

At some good news in a world of bad news.


23 posted on 10/15/2018 5:07:57 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Who cares?


24 posted on 10/15/2018 5:16:06 AM PDT by Dont tread and Live (waso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

A quadroon. Sounds like a cookie.


25 posted on 10/15/2018 5:17:34 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Not surprised she wore white despite being not a virgin. That rule has been broken for years.


26 posted on 10/15/2018 5:24:44 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Okay... that explains the all over tans.


27 posted on 10/15/2018 5:29:13 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Who the hell are they?


28 posted on 10/15/2018 5:34:53 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist ( (Be Nice To Your Kids. They Will Pick Out Your Nursing Home))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

I think they delayed the announcement until after Princess Eugenie’s wedding on Friday. It was a good decision so as to not steal the limelight from Eugenie.


29 posted on 10/15/2018 5:42:41 AM PDT by Gumdrop (24.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
Did someone alert the media?

The people want to know...or something.

30 posted on 10/15/2018 5:53:27 AM PDT by OldSmaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

I watched the Dukes of Hazzard for a long time, and they are no Dukes of Hazzard.

31 posted on 10/15/2018 5:57:43 AM PDT by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

If you believe the UK media, the couple told the family at the wedding. Which is interesting because Camilla wasn’t there for either the wedding or, apparently, the announcement.


32 posted on 10/15/2018 6:05:32 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kalee
I like American Royalty better.


33 posted on 10/15/2018 6:13:19 AM PDT by Rebelbase (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

Which they did to begin with, after Eugenie had announced her wedding well before Prince Harry. They preempted her wedding by announcing their wedding, at the same place and months before hers, when her announcement had said October. They received ALL the interest, to the point that the BBC didn’t televise Eugenie’s wedding. I am sick to my stomach with all the attention that attention ho Meghan gets. Third wedding, this time to a Prince? Yes, a total grifter. And the reason their’s was a slap up job was her age. Apparently she told Harry they needed to get married ASAP as she was getting on in years to be able to have a baby. Harry must be a real dolt to be taken in by this phony.


34 posted on 10/15/2018 6:23:14 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

More money for the twice divorcee when she gets a 3rd divorce.


35 posted on 10/15/2018 6:25:55 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Or the Trumps.


36 posted on 10/15/2018 6:39:15 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Or the Trumps.


37 posted on 10/15/2018 6:48:04 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Does she know who the father is?


38 posted on 10/15/2018 6:50:36 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

Yep.


39 posted on 10/15/2018 6:57:32 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Is that Harry and Markle?


40 posted on 10/15/2018 6:58:16 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam ("Do not discount anything in which Donald Trump is involved." - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson