[DrewsMum]

You don’t have to be a jerk.
I know about it in the Federalist papers.

I just was asking what part of Article III you were referring to because I like to research and continually educate myself and learn from others. And “reason” things out...
Glad to know anyone who asks you a question about a statement you made is a lunatic.
Calm down. Eat some fiber.

[AndyJackson]

Sorry. We can all deplore Roe v Wade. The problem is that a lot of the staunchest opponents of abortion view the problem as not a fallibility of men but a faillbility of the interpretation of the Constitution, believing that the problem lies in the power of Constitutional Review.

But, the question for the founders was to whom do you trust the power to declare acts unconstitutional - the Legislature as some would maintain. Imagine our laws without the restraint of a Supreme Court reviewing whether various laws passed by Congress transgressed Consitutional limits. We woul all be baking cakes for LGBTWQSPVrs