Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DrewsMum
Sorry. We can all deplore Roe v Wade. The problem is that a lot of the staunchest opponents of abortion view the problem as not a fallibility of men but a faillbility of the interpretation of the Constitution, believing that the problem lies in the power of Constitutional Review.

But, the question for the founders was to whom do you trust the power to declare acts unconstitutional - the Legislature as some would maintain. Imagine our laws without the restraint of a Supreme Court reviewing whether various laws passed by Congress transgressed Consitutional limits. We woul all be baking cakes for LGBTWQSPVrs

127 posted on 10/17/2018 8:26:53 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson

I have never connected Roe to MvsM.
It’s just the opposite. I think Roe NEEDS judicial Review. That’s the only way to get rid of it. In my opinion.


128 posted on 10/17/2018 10:12:47 AM PDT by DrewsMum (The public cannot be too curious concerning the choharacters of public menÂ…(or WOMEN) Samuel Adam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson