Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; Bull Snipe; x; rockrr; DoodleDawg
DiogenesLamp: "Article IV, says the same thing, so it's really axiomatic."

It says no such thing and only your own wild fantasies imagine them the same.
Indeed, as I read the Dred Scott history, even crazy Roger himself never argued the kind of nonsense DiogenesLamp posts here over & over in defense of the Dred Scott ruling.

So we can see the most bizarre situation possible: DiogenesLamp agrees with crazy Roger's ruling but for reasons which crazy Roger himself was never imaginative enough to concoct!!

How does that even work?

616 posted on 10/16/2018 12:54:24 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
It says no such thing and only your own wild fantasies imagine them the same.

Really? What does this mean?

No Person ... shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour,

630 posted on 10/16/2018 1:27:03 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson