To: BroJoeK
Your problem is that constitutionally we have to go by what the Supreme Court rules until we can elect enough representatives from our own party to change the court's makeup more to our own liking. Law should not change depending upon who sits on the bench. If it does, it is not actual law, it is usurpation of the law.
597 posted on
10/16/2018 11:28:51 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp:
"Law should not change depending upon who sits on the bench.
If it does, it is not actual law, it is usurpation of the law." So yet again DiogenesLamp puffs himself up with god-like powers to declare which laws are "actual" and which are "usurpations".
I was hoping my pre-preamble humor would take care of that problem, but apparently I was too subtle...
Amazing.
629 posted on
10/16/2018 1:22:23 PM PDT by
BroJoeK
((a little historical perspective...))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson