Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
Your problem is that constitutionally we have to go by what the Supreme Court rules until we can elect enough representatives from our own party to change the court's makeup more to our own liking.

Law should not change depending upon who sits on the bench. If it does, it is not actual law, it is usurpation of the law.

597 posted on 10/16/2018 11:28:51 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp: "Law should not change depending upon who sits on the bench.
If it does, it is not actual law, it is usurpation of the law."

So yet again DiogenesLamp puffs himself up with god-like powers to declare which laws are "actual" and which are "usurpations".
I was hoping my pre-preamble humor would take care of that problem, but apparently I was too subtle...

Amazing.

629 posted on 10/16/2018 1:22:23 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson