Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ontap

As opposed those who fought for men who could buy and sell human beings.


211 posted on 10/13/2018 11:00:10 AM PDT by jmacusa (Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: jmacusa
Both sides did that. You keep trying to make it about slavery, and you keep ignoring the fact that slavery was legal in the Union, and it remained legal in the North longer than it did in the South.

You want to make it about slavery, because you have no other argument to justify the Northern armies invading the South.

221 posted on 10/13/2018 11:24:26 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: jmacusa

You do realize there were slave states in the north don’t you!! You do realize Lincoln did nothing to free those slaves. You do realize Grant owned a slave and did not free him till after the war!!! You do realize Lincolns first choice was Lee!! So his first choice was a slaveholder and his final choice was a slaveholder!!!


224 posted on 10/13/2018 11:28:27 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: jmacusa
In the 19th century blacks were not considered capable of living on their own, they were at best though of as children or child like. This thinking was universal BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH.

If you judge the people of the 19th century by the standards of the 21st century you will get very distorted view of history.

291 posted on 10/13/2018 9:05:06 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson