Posted on 10/11/2018 4:07:31 PM PDT by Libloather
California's new gender quota law, SB 826, has attracted widespread attention. The law mandates that a publicly held domestic or foreign corporation principal executive offices, according to the corporation’s SEC Form 10-K , are located in California must have a minimum of one female director on its board by the close of 2019. No later than the close of 2021, the corporation must have a minimum of three female directors, if its number of directors is six or more; a minimum of two female directors if its number of directors is five, or a minimum of one female director if its number of directors is four or fewer. Some readers have questioned the definition of "female" for purposes of the statute.
The California legislature has defined "gender" in several different codes (e.g., Civ. Code § 51; Educ. Code § 10.7; and Ins. Code § 10140). Recently, it has recognized at least three genders - female, male, and nonbinary. See California Bill May Spur Rewriting Gender Boilerplate. I have been unable, however, to locate any existing California statute that defines "female", "male" or "nonbinary".
Given the substantial penalties that may be assessed for failure to have the prescribed minimum number of female directors, who counts as a female director could be an important question. The legislature provides a Delphic answer ("γνῶθι ἑαυτόν") by defining a "female" for purposes of the gender quota requirements as "an individual who self-identifies her gender as a woman, without regard to the individual’s designated sex at birth". Cal. Corp. Code § 301.3(f)(1).
(Excerpt) Read more at natlawreview.com ...
Note: this topic is from . Thanks Libloather.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.