Posted on 10/11/2018 4:07:31 PM PDT by Libloather
I can see where this is going. “Gentlemen, who is putting on the dresses for the board meeting tomorrow?”
So a California corporation, say, Apple, could put me on their board as a female if I really, really feel like I am one?
I bet Apple is a Delaware company, just like 99.99% of public companies.
What a stupid question. A simple blood test should provide the answer.
It defies imagination that they can support google or facebook discriminating as they see fit by excusing them for being a private business, yet they can make a law to dictate how private boards can operate.
Yeah, I can’t do either of those things. Better stick with the equipment I’ve got...
I thought they figured this out last month . . . females are the ones with the front holes.
“If I had a piece of bread for every gender, I could make a sandwich” - Jacob Contreras
The law doesn’t prohibit all-female boards. On its face discriminatory. Also since California doesn’t define “female” it is unconstitutionally vague. It doesn’t even suggest a customary definition, so it’s up to every individual.
Now they will need a Gender Determination Board along with a Racial Determination Board appointed by the Govener. All members to be paid at least 500k.
Wow. So to comply with this new law, all you need to do is have one of the guys on your existing Board of Directors declare that he identifies as female. Problem solved!
California should rule that each 63 “genders” be on boards.
> I’m going nonbinary. Best of both worlds. And all bathrooms are accessible.
And you double your chances of getting a date!
Putting on a dress? That’s sexist! Women can dress exactly the same as men!
(I’ve even seen a few who can grow better beards than I can.)
Who Is A Female?
*********
Look for the “Y”. Not there, female!
As a male with ample beard stub, can I go to Nordstroms and buy female business suits for myself in preparation for my new female identity and candidacy for one of those oochy-coochy lucrativious Cali board positions?
There is no need for government to define male or female. For millennia humans have all known what the difference is. It’s something so obvious that no definition is needed.
CA is going to make a law that contradicts human nature. That law IS invalid and non-binding. Those who made the law are incompetent and insane.
THAT’S IT! Right there. Bingo!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.