Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kavanaugh will be on the US supreme court for life. Here's how we [liberals] fight back
The Guardian ^ | 10/09/2018 | Ian Samuel

Posted on 10/09/2018 10:10:21 AM PDT by nikos1121

Brett Kavanaugh has been confirmed, and he will serve as a justice on the supreme court for the rest of his life. This event assures rightwing dominance of the court for a generation – or so we are told. After all, at 53, he is not even the youngest conservative: Justice Neil Gorsuch is 51. The chief justice, who has been there for more than a decade, is only 63. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, by contrast, is 85, and Justice Stephen Breyer is 80. We are in, it seems, for decades of misery for labor unions, voting rights, regulation of businesses and all the rest. Or are we? The logic behind this “lost for a generation” stuff is simple enough. There are nine seats on the supreme court. All of its members serve for life. The five-justice conservative majority is quite young and seems healthy. Given all that, Kavanaugh’s confirmation is the final nail in the coffin, isn’t it? The ray of hope, if there is one, lies in contradiction of the first of those premises. Nothing in the constitution fixes the number of supreme court seats at nine. The size of the court is set by legislation, and has varied over time. We started with six. We’ve gone as high as 10 (when Abraham Lincoln was president, and Congress worried about a reactionary supreme court invalidating his wartime measures). Only recently, Republicans held the court to eight members for a year in the wake of Antonin Scalia’s death. So, then, the next time the left has some political power, why not just expand the size of the supreme court and add another handful of justices? Make Brett Kavanaugh a gifted and energetic member of a 10-to-5 minority. Don’t get mad, in other words: get even.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kritocracy; liberalagenda; paragraphs; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: nikos1121

The Guardian sounds more like The Whinean!


81 posted on 10/09/2018 12:39:49 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harpotoo

You know you’re right. Why should she stay on there now? They’ve patched her together, just to work. Poor thing should retire and enjoy life.


82 posted on 10/09/2018 12:41:48 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Do they have a Fourth of July in England?


83 posted on 10/09/2018 12:42:13 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Harpotoo

that was such a good post from you I’m responding a second time...


84 posted on 10/09/2018 12:42:33 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

They make Abbie Hoffman appear tame


85 posted on 10/09/2018 1:16:39 PM PDT by wardaddy (I donÂ’t care that youÂ’re not a racist......when the shooting starts it wonÂ’t matte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
When FDR tried to pack the Supreme Court, the Democrats had a 334 to 88 advantage in the House (with 13 seats held by other parties) and a 76 to 16 advantage in the Senate (with 4 seats held by other parties). Even then he couldn't get Congress to go along.

If the Democrats were to try to increase the size of the Supreme Court, Trump could veto the bill, and it is unlikely they could override the veto. Of course they would want to law to take effect in 2021 so that Fauxcahontas or Kamala could be the one to choose the new justices.

86 posted on 10/09/2018 2:08:18 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Do they have a Fourth of July in England?

No, they count the days in July from 1 to 3 and then from 5 to 32.

87 posted on 10/09/2018 2:10:42 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Absolutely


88 posted on 10/09/2018 2:30:53 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

I did not

Link?


89 posted on 10/09/2018 2:34:25 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

So, then, the next time the left has some political power, why not just expand the size of the supreme court and add another handful of justices?

Why stop there? Why not flying tribunals?
It will make sending anyone to camps a lot easier.


90 posted on 10/09/2018 2:39:21 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Isn’t The Guardian a British rag??


91 posted on 10/09/2018 2:47:01 PM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

In other words, stack the court not by established procedures but by changing the law.

FDR tried it when progressives were winning and it didn’t work.

At best they’d get a law the sitting predident could not take advantage of, and then lose the presidency in the next election, due to their shenanigans - backfire.


92 posted on 10/09/2018 3:30:21 PM PDT by Wuli (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
He does not say because these are the flimsiest of excuses for "my side gets to cheat to win".

Our side has high-velocity "cheating pellets"...

93 posted on 10/09/2018 3:51:19 PM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Leftist Approach to all failures:

Refuse to accept it.

Change the rules.


94 posted on 10/09/2018 3:59:20 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
so that Fauxcahontas or Kamala could be the one to choose the new justices.

Kameltoe, The Whore That Roared?

Wait'll Willie's homemade sex video of Kameltoe polishing his bumper hitch surfaces...

95 posted on 10/09/2018 4:24:31 PM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

I suspected as much.


96 posted on 10/09/2018 6:36:31 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
I assume it was obvious that I was joking. With the prime meridian running through Greenwich, it would create a lot of confusion if Britain had different numbers for days in July than the countries nearby.

Anyway, John Adams expected July 2nd to be celebrated as Independence Day, not the 4th.

97 posted on 10/09/2018 7:03:03 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Since the democrats have no shame, if they ever get in power again, it wouldn’t surprise me a bit to see them do it. After all, Obama certainly did his part by appointing many many extreme left federal judges. Trump will appoint conservative federal judges, and SC justices, but congressional conservatives are too honorable (relatively speaking) to expand the Court.


98 posted on 10/09/2018 7:14:08 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Could that not be challenged all the way to the Supreme Court. The republican owned Supreme Court :)


99 posted on 10/10/2018 1:01:48 AM PDT by melsec (There's a track, winding back, to an old forgotten shack along the road to Gundagai..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

Fortunately for us Obama did not appoint as many as he could, (probably because he couldn’t find enough left wingers, and secondly, he figured HIllarly could do it, and lastly he was plain our a friggin lazy F...).

We’re seeing the golden age of Pericles my friends. It’s like we finally hav a real man in power.


100 posted on 10/10/2018 3:24:08 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson