“When he won the nomination in 2016, it wasn’t unreasonable to think that Trump wouldn’t win the general election, he wouldn’t be true to his promise on judges even if he won, and even if he nominated the right people, he wouldn’t care enough about the Court to see through a difficult, high-stakes confirmation fight.”
Speak for yourself, you dumbass Low-life.
“Speak for yourself, you dumbass Low-life.”
I can get on board with that sentiment.
Someone way smarter than me needs to analyze and report on what makes these Never-Trumpers tick. I have an idea, but I think it falls far short of what’s really going on.
You and your ilk at the National Review were given an invitation to the Trump party early-on but you chose to publicly and blatantly reject it in favor of bashing Trump.
And now, after two years of seeing Trump's successes, you decide to crash the Trump party, when the bouncer should have rejected you at the door.
It's easy to Monday morning quarterback Trump's first two years while you stood on the opponent's sideline, booing him.
And it's transparent to conservatives that you now want to bask in Trump's success after you have barely stopped holding your nose.
How about publishing an issue of your magazine, listing all the contributing editors and writers on the cover, lauding Trump's successes and conservatism, to make-up for your disgusting behavior against him previously.
You may consider Trump your "flawed" friend now but what you really are is a "fair-weather" friend, who's support depends on which way the political winds are blowing.
Weak, Lowry, real weak.
No, he is right.
Until Trump ran against Hillary!, he was a NYC Democrat in good standing. I thought everything he promised was his “negotiating position.”
I voted against Hillary, which meant voting for Trump.
I didn’t expect much from him, but I have never been so happy about being wrong. A politician who tries to keep his promises. How amazing!