Posted on 10/07/2018 11:08:57 AM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Hidden by the rabid anti-Trump media, who were preoccupied with their role in reporting non-stop the coverage of the protesters who were paid to disrupt the hearings for President Trumps Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was a letter that Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley sent to the attorneys for accuser Christine Blasey-Ford.
Chairman Grassley sent the letter on Thursday, the same day as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell moved for cloture to advance Kavanaughs nomination to the full Senate where a vote would them be taken (Friday) to open a 30-hour period of comment and consideration before the final confirmation vote could take place on Saturday.
You would think that Grassley was aware that Leader McConnell would be moving for cloture when he wrote that letter.
The FBI investigation had already concluded and Senator Jeff Flake announced that it was comprehensive in its scope and convincing to him that Kavanaugh was in the clear. Flake would be a yes vote unless something drastic happened overnight.
By Thursday night, Kavanaughs nomination seemingly cleared the last hurdle and was moving towards a confirmation vote. So the radical feminazis intensified their assault on decency and the rule of law knowing their propagandists in the mainstream media would apply as much pressure as possible to the few wavering Republicans.
While that was going on, the media missed (deliberately or otherwise) what appears to be an ominous threat to the corrupt Democrat matriarchy contained within Grassleys letter:
The letters last paragraph contains this demand:
I urge you once again, now for the third time in writing, to turn over the therapy notes, polygraph materials, and communications with The Washington Post that Dr. Ford has relied upon as evidence. In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter, in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27 hearing; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick P.J. Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.
There are a number of revealing statements contained within:
Grassley makes it known that he requested certain documents and materials that Fords attorneys repeatedly relied on as being corroborative of Fords charges. At the time of Grassleys first two requests the FBI investigation was still open.
Still, on the eve of the vote, after two previous attempts, Grassley was giving Ford and her attorneys one last opportunity to produce these materials:
The therapy notes pertaining to Christine Ford The polygraph materials that was used to bolster Fords credibility Fords communications with the Washington Post
Why didnt Fords attorneys turn those documents over for review by the committee? As Grassley made clear earlier in his letter:
You have claimed repeatedly that the evidence I have requested supports Dr. Fords allegations against Judge Kavanaugh. She even provided some of this evidence to national news. Indeed, if the evidence supported your clients allegations, you surely would produce it as quickly as you could.
After calling out Fords attorneys for trying to destroy Judge Kavanaugh using salacious but unverified charges, Grassley was only getting started. He also demanded:
[any] records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following:
(1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono,
(2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick P.J. Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.
Why would Grassley, with the investigation completed and the Senate moving to the confirmation vote, make such a demand unless he was considering beginning disciplinary proceedings (perhaps criminal proceedings) against Ford's attorneys and corrupt Democrat Senators Dianne Feinstein and Mazie Hirono for collaboration?
When McConnell was asked about these charges, and the Witness tempering, he basically said it was ‘Time to move on”. Nothing will happen to these Lying Scum.
If McConnel backs off now they will just do it again next time. Stomp a mud hole in them now so they cant get up again.
Please, Grassley needs to follow this through to the end. The demonrats’ games need to be stopped. Shine the light on them for all the world to see.
McConnell better not wimp out.
Instead she wanted revenge, which is not the same and indistinguishable from political actions.
I feel good about defending Kavanaugh.
Screw the Feminists.
Charge Ford, Feinstein, Schumer, Katz and Soros with incitement to foment overthrow of the government.
I hope I never receive a scathing letter.
And so the biting of the jugulars of the underprivileged begins.
For some reason, my memory is reviewing the supposed photo of Ford taking the poly. The profile looks like the scandalous FBI friend more than it does Ford.!
Heard him say this on Ingraham Angle show.
Same old wimps, don’t you dare punish the brats.
Thanks McTurtle, blame on your hands in the future.
Bookmark
Wow— that is SOME letter, especially in the context that it is the 2nd letter during the run up to the FBI re-investigation... and that the materials would have been provided to the FBI by the Senate Committee so provided. Which means— there was ZERO corroboration the FBI would have obtained from the materials Ford’s attorney’s should have been GLAD to provide— but did not!
This is disbarment territory and potentially criminal charges against Bromwich, Katz and etc. Grassley is still ticked off and this should sustain the ticked off Red wave being reminded of this SCAM of a ploy to smear Judge K.
Is it time for an office fire started by an overheating computer?
Primary goal: prevent this from being repeated again and again and again.
That’s a wig she has on, right?
“Heard him say this on Ingraham Angle show. Same old wimps, dont you dare punish the brats. Thanks McTurtle, blame on your hands in the future.”
I heard that, too, and it made me so angry. For him, it’s good enough for him just to win this battle. It isn’t enough.
If the criminals and liars aren’t brought to justice, the next confirmation hearing will be worse. Maybe Mitch is a closet thrill seeker and enjoys the drama. We certainly don’t.
Also, the cloud over Kavanaugh will exist until the truth comes out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.