[yesthatjallen]

If justices followed the Constitution there would be no swing votes.

[Beagle8U]

I’m sure that Roberts will step up and fill that role./barf

[Oscar in Batangas]

Elections have consequences, darlin’

If you think this is bad, wait til ol’ Ruthie goes to that Big Bench in the Sky

[Bringbackthedraft]

If justices followed the Constitution there would be no swing votes. ................................. Absolutely! Had I been the 1st to answer this, I would have said the court should be comprised of all swing voters. What she is saying is that Democrats won’t get their way most of the time. If they were all democrats there would be no complaints from them nor would they allow any.

[DoughtyOne]

But if the appointment was made by Hillary, none of this would matter.

Kagan... well never mind!

[jospehm20]

Statements like this is how you get more Trump.

[WASCWatch]

She wouldn’t be saying this if Hillary was the one nominating judges for the U.S. Supreme Court.

[morphing libertarian]

Someone pass the tissue. Boo f——n Hoo. Read the constitution you AA appointment.

I don’t remember in the constitution where is says there has to be a swing vote.

lastly USSC judges would STFU and judge cases.

[eccentric]

Roberts is still there....

[Secret Agent Man]

And if true, so. the. hell. what?

Nothing demands a scotus have a swing vote.

Where was the worry when scotus banked hard left in the 60s?

[lurk]

If the whole court were originalist, we wouldn’t have all this drama about swing votes and majorities.

[VRWCarea51]

Note to court jester: That’s why we elected Trump!

Smart, she ain’t

[RightGeek]

Womp Womp sad trombone

[ontap]

Hope not....that’s why I voted for Trump!!!

[FLT-bird]

I don’t fear that, I welcome it.

What I will welcome even more though is the Donald getting to appoint the replacements for Ruth Buzzard, Breyer and the Wide Latina.

[minnesota_bound]

So why can’t Kagan be the swing vote? hmm...
Because she votes lockstep against the US and with the democrat party.

[Robert357]

Hey Elena;

Just wait until Trump picks a replacement for Ginsberg. Then see how you feel to out of tune with the others.

[Yo-Yo]

Kagan warns that the Supreme Court may not be able to legislate from the bench anymore.

[Pollster1]

If justices followed the Constitution there would be no swing votes.

Exactly what I was going to say.

[A_Former_Democrat]

Oh but I thought you Justices were supposed to be unbiased, nonpolitical, and even tempered?

[trebb]

Exactly - she complains that SCOTUS will be down to only 4 partisan liberals versus 5 who believe the law counts for something.